Applicability of watermarking for intellectual property rights protection in a 3D printing scenario

Macq, Benoı̂t; Alface, Patrice Rondão; Montanola, Mireia

doi:10.1145/2775292.2775313

Cited by 32 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Despite all these research efforts exploring a wide space of solutions (from the spatial to the spectral domain), the search for a functional and practical watermarking approach for protecting 3D content online is still a challenging issue [120]. This is mostly because these attempts have generally led to applications that are demonstrators rather than fully qualified products, but also because watermarking has led to collateral issues, such as infringement recognition.…”

Section: Production and Protection Of Shared 3d Content Onlinementioning

confidence: 99%

Publishing and Consuming 3D Content on the Web: A Survey

Potenziani

Callieri

Dellepiane

et al. 2018

FNT in Computer Graphics and Vision

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Three-dimensional content is becoming an important component of the World Wide Web environment. From the advent of WebGL to the present, a wide number of solutions have been developed (including libraries, middleware, and applications), encouraging the establishment of 3D data as online media of practical use. The fast development of 3D technologies and related web-based resources makes it difficult to identify and properly understand the current trends and open issues. Starting from these premises, this survey analyzes the state of the art of 3D web publishing, reviews the possibilities provided by the major current approaches, proposes a categorization of the features supported by existing solutions, and cross-maps these with the requirements of a few main application domains. The results of this analysis should help in defining the technical characteristics needed to build efficient and effective 3D data presentation, taking into account the application contexts.

show abstract

Section: Production and Protection Of Shared 3d Content Onlinementioning

confidence: 99%

Publishing and Consuming 3D Content on the Web: A Survey

Potenziani

Callieri

Dellepiane

et al. 2018

FNT in Computer Graphics and Vision

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Other researchers have employed steganography and watermarking techniques to embed specific data that could point to the action generator [14][15][16][17]. While the nature of conventional watermarking or steganography processes is not to modify the digital object in a manner that is noticeable, it does nonetheless modify the document.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biometrically Linking Document Leakage to the Individuals Responsible

Alruban

Clarke

et al. 2018

Trust, Privacy and Security in Digital Business

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Insider threats are a significant security issue. The last decade has witnessed countless instances of data loss and exposure in which data has become publicly available and easily accessible. Losing or disclosing sensitive data or confidential information may cause substantial financial and reputational damage to a company. Whilst more recent research has specifically focused on the insider misuse problem, it has tended to focus on the information itselfeither through its protection or approaches to detect leakage. In contrast, this paper presents a proactive approach to the attribution of misuse via information leakage using biometrics and a locality-sensitive hashing scheme. The hash digest of the object (e.g. a document) is mapped with the given biometric information of the person who interacted with it and generates a digital imprint file that represents the correlation between the two parties. The proposed approach does not directly store or preserve any explicit biometric information nor document copy in a repository. It is only the established correlation (imprint) is kept for the purpose of reconstructing the mapped information once an incident occurred. Comprehensive experiments for the proposed approach have shown that it is highly possible to establish this correlation even when the original version has undergone significant file modification. In many scenarios, such as changing the file format r removing parts of the document, including words and sentences, it was possible to extract and reconstruct the correlated biometric information out of a modified document (e.g. 100 words were deleted) with an average success rate of 89.31%.

show abstract

“…It is important to note that, in the context of additive manufacturing, intellectual property is not limited to the specifications of the 3D object geometry -it can also include the specifications of the properties of the manufactured object and the manufacturing process parameters that ensure the fulfillment of the physical requirements [44]. Physical watermarking techniques have been discussed as a means to protect intellectual property in additive manufacturing environments [26].…”

Section: Additive Manufacturing Securitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing From the Security Perspective

Yampolskiy

King

Pope

et al. 2017

Critical Infrastructure Protection XI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Additive manufacturing involves a new class of cyber-physical systems that manufacture 3D objects incrementally by depositing and fusing together thin layers of source material. In 2015, the global additive manufacturing industry had°5.165 billion in revenue, with 32.5% of all manufactured objects used as functional parts. Because of their reliance on computerization, additive manufacturing devices (or 3D printers) are susceptible to a broad range of attacks. The rapid adoption of additive manufacturing in aerospace, automotive and other industries makes it an attractive attack target and a critical asset to be protected. This chapter compares emerging additive manufacturing and traditional subtractive manufacturing from the security perspective. While the discussion compares the two manufacturing technologies, the emphasis is on additive manufacturing due to its expected dominance as the manufacturing technology of the future. The chapter outlines the additive and subtractive manufacturing workflows, proposes a framework for analyzing attacks on or using additive manufacturing systems and presents the major threat categories. In order to compare the two manufacturing paradigms from the security perspective, the differences between the two workflows are identified and the attack analysis framework is applied to demonstrate how the differences translate into threats. The analysis reveals that, while there is significant overlap with regard to security, fundamental differences in the two manufacturing paradigms require a separate investigation of additive manufacturing security.

show abstract

Applicability of watermarking for intellectual property rights protection in a 3D printing scenario

Cited by 32 publications

References 34 publications

Publishing and Consuming 3D Content on the Web: A Survey

Publishing and Consuming 3D Content on the Web: A Survey

Biometrically Linking Document Leakage to the Individuals Responsible

Evaluation of Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing From the Security Perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About