2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a Cloud Model-Set Pair Analysis in Hazard Assessment for Biomass Gasification Stations

Abstract: Because a biomass gasification station includes various hazard factors, hazard assessment is needed and significant. In this article, the cloud model (CM) is employed to improve set pair analysis (SPA), and a novel hazard assessment method for a biomass gasification station is proposed based on the cloud model-set pair analysis (CM-SPA). In this method, cloud weight is proposed to be the weight of index. In contrast to the index weight of other methods, cloud weight is shown by cloud descriptors; hence, the ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) Pairwise comparison matrix was used to judge both importance of criteria to middle factors and middle factors to the overall goal [16]. The matrix reflected the pairwise comparison and was compared on a scale of 1/9-9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(2) Pairwise comparison matrix was used to judge both importance of criteria to middle factors and middle factors to the overall goal [16]. The matrix reflected the pairwise comparison and was compared on a scale of 1/9-9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same, En′ is also a stochastic instantiation and fulfills EN'~N (En, He 2 ). Ex satisfies the following [8, 16]. T1μ=exEx2/2En2…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e specific calculation method of the symptom weight was given in the literature [20]. e standardized values of each index were obtained after CM characteristic numbers and the cloud weight calculation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…运用改进的 AHP [20] ,综合专家打分调查结果,利用标度法建立判断矩阵,求得主观 权重值γ;运用熵权法 [21] (7) 计算得到评价等级特征值为3.069,可知评价 等级最接近Ⅲ级,通过云发生器计算各等级概率,可得评价结果如图 2 所示。根据 3En 原 则 [22] (可以忽略 [Ex-3En,Ex+3En] 区间以外云滴对煤炭资源可持续力等级的影响) ,可 表 1 煤炭资源可持续力评价指标体系 Table 1 The index system of sustainable capacity evaluation of coal resources Table 3 Weights…”
unclassified