2013
DOI: 10.1002/mmce.20746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a multiline material characterization method to inkjet printed electronics

Abstract: Material characterization has become increasingly important with the adoption of simulation-based workflow for microwave electronics design. This article focuses on the characterization of printable electronics materials using transmission-line measurements and demonstrates the capability of the multiline characterization method to separate dielectric and conductor losses when line geometry and material properties vary between the lines. The effects of multiline algorithm, number of line standards, and methods… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters for the conductor were obtained from the average dc sheet resistance R s = 40 mΩ/ measured from 10 Greek cross [17] test structures. Highfrequency analysis with multiline characterization method [18][19][20] [21] confirmed the validity of using the dc value at 2.4 GHz. The loss tangent and relative permittivity of human body are available at [22] from which they were defined for simulations as frequency dependent parameters [15].…”
Section: Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The parameters for the conductor were obtained from the average dc sheet resistance R s = 40 mΩ/ measured from 10 Greek cross [17] test structures. Highfrequency analysis with multiline characterization method [18][19][20] [21] confirmed the validity of using the dc value at 2.4 GHz. The loss tangent and relative permittivity of human body are available at [22] from which they were defined for simulations as frequency dependent parameters [15].…”
Section: Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%