2017
DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2017.1324402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of analytical hierarchy process for selecting an interior window blind

Abstract: Application of analytical hierarchy process for selecting an interior window blind. and 57% respectively and the weight of visual comfort is above 4%. Architectural Engineering and DesignHowever, changing thermal comfort weight has no impact on ranking of the blinds. This study shows the capability of AHP in managing the conflicts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AHP, introduced by Saaty [34], is one of the most commonly used MCDM methods for selecting a trade-off construction solution. The eligibility of the AHP in finding a solution based on the trade-off between visual comfort, thermal comfort, energy demand, and the life-cycle costs was discussed and found to be applicable by Jalilzadehazhari, Johansson, Johansson and Mahapatra [23].…”
Section: Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AHP, introduced by Saaty [34], is one of the most commonly used MCDM methods for selecting a trade-off construction solution. The eligibility of the AHP in finding a solution based on the trade-off between visual comfort, thermal comfort, energy demand, and the life-cycle costs was discussed and found to be applicable by Jalilzadehazhari, Johansson, Johansson and Mahapatra [23].…”
Section: Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the out-comes from this development is that a huge number of products could be evaluated in the design phase and from such, the final choice of product could be done. For this to be practically usable though, the information about products need to be automatically retrieved (Jalilzadehazhari et al, 2017, Negendahl, 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple MCDM methods have been developed and introduced for resolving a variety of decision-making problems (Peniwati, 2007). In the context of the window and blind design, Jalilzadehazhari, Johansson, Johansson, and Mahapatra (2017) employed a MCDM method to select a trade-off interior blind, based on trade-off between visual comfort, thermal comfort, energy consumption and LCC. The trade-off blind was selected among 40 different interior blinds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%