may or may not adequately attenuate the pesticide to an acceptable level.In the case of lindane, little effective attenuation through adsorption to the sand substrate would be expected from a continuous source. If the pesticide entered the aquifer in a slug, it might be adsorbed immediately and effectively removed from causing potential harm to the water interests. The leaching by uncontaminated waters may cause sufficient dilution to negate potential problems. However, the initially adsorbed lindane would be expected to be readily removed and transported, which could possibly cause harmful results to interests susceptible to chronic low-level exposure.An aquifer contaminated by dieldrin might be expected to react somewhat differently. The considerably increased capacity of the sand for dieldrin would result in an attenuation over a short distance. Once attenuated, the dieldrin might be expected to travel at a much slower rate and in lower concentrations than lindane. This difference would be expected to be magnified in areas where the groundwater contained appreciable amounts of dissolved organics.Variations of pH, particle size, and temperature likely to be found in most subsurface environments would have little effect on the disposition of either pesticide in the aquifer. Simple batch-type tests on the other chlorinated pesticides for comparison of uptake capacity can be expected to yield insight to permit an estimation of their relative disposition in a given aquifer.