Application of CCUS to the WtE sector

Tota, Vincenzo; Viganò, Federico; Gatti, Manuele; García, Mónica

doi:10.2139/ssrn.3821514

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The site selection process for these projects is crucial to their success and must consider safety, the economy, the environment, and public acceptance at all levels of operation, including country-wide, basin-wide, regional, or sub-basin levels [28,29]. Although CCS and CCUS technologies have similarities in their site selection process, they will induce different physical and chemical responses in underground porous or fractured rock formations, depending on existing hydrological (H), thermal (T), mechanical (M), and chemical (C) fields [30,31].…”

Section: Carbon Capture and Storage (Ccs) And Carbon Capture And Util...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring Public Attitudes and Acceptance of CCUS Technologies in JABODETABEK: A Cross-Sectional Study

Sitinjak,

Ebennezer,

Ober

2023

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the most essential elements of environmental protection is an appropriate policy towards carbon capture, utilisation, and storage (CCUS). On the one hand, these technologies are being dynamically developed. Still, on the other hand, we often encounter social resistance to change and new technologies, which is one of the main barriers to their implementation. This research examined public acceptance and awareness of Indonesia’s CCUS technologies. Five hundred respondents completed an online survey representing Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Bekasi, and Tangerang. The study found that the respondents had more favourable feelings towards carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) than CO2 capture and storage (CCS), perceiving CCU as more innovative, necessary, cost-effective, secure, environmentally friendly, and beneficial to regional and national economies than CCS. However, in Indonesia, most respondents did not embrace the development of CCUS technology due to a lack of knowledge and fear, which can lead to violence. The results indicate that an individual’s awareness of perceived risks and the ability to safeguard the environment are crucial to their acceptance of CCUS technology. These findings contribute to understanding the public perception of CCUS technologies in Indonesia and can help to develop effective communication strategies to improve public understanding and acceptance of CCUS initiatives.

show abstract

Section: Carbon Capture and Storage (Ccs) And Carbon Capture And Util...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring Public Attitudes and Acceptance of CCUS Technologies in JABODETABEK: A Cross-Sectional Study

Sitinjak,

Ebennezer,

Ober

2023

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Depending on the origin of the waste used, the integration of WTE and carbon capture and storage (CCS) could enable waste to be a netzero or even net negative emissions energy source (Kearns 2019;Wienchol et al 2020). For example, in Europe only, the integration of CCS with WTE facilities has the potential to capture about 60 to 70 million tonnes of carbon dioxide annually (Tota et al 2021).…”

Section: Waste-to-energymentioning

confidence: 99%

Energy Systems

2023

Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Costs and Benefits of Low-carbon Energy System Transitions in the Context of Sustainable Development �� 703 Frequently Asked Questions �� 707 FAQ 6.1: Will energy systems that emit little or no CO 2 be different than those of today? 707 FAQ 6.2: Can renewable sources provide all the energy needed for energy systems that emit little or no CO 2 ? �� 707 FAQ 6.3: What are the most important steps to decarbonise the energy system? �� 707 Energy Systems Chapter 6

show abstract