2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03648-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of circulating genetically abnormal cells in the diagnosis of early-stage lung cancer

Abstract: Background Lung cancer is the primary cause of cancer related death worldwide, early detection of the disease contributes to early diagnosis and reduce the incidence of death from lung cancer. Therefore, an effective and non-invasive method for early diagnosis of lung cancer is urgently needed. Methods To evaluate the diagnostic performance of circulating genetically abnormal cells(CAC) in early lung cancer, a total of 63 participants who completed CAC detection by ZHUHAI SANMED BIOTECH INC. and obtained patho… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the diagnostic value of CACs in comparison with other traditional biomarkers has been confirmed using a cohort of patients with lung nodules, which is an independent validation to the work conducted by Ye et al [ 24 ]. In the present study, the highest diagnostic efficiency was achieved when a CAC counts of 3 was chosen as the cut-off value, this result is similar to the study conducted by Qiu [ 25 ] and Ye [ 18 ] et al Overall, CAC counts presented better diagnostic value than commonly used tumour markers (CEA, CYFRA21–1, and NSE), which agrees with the results of several studies reporting the advantages of CACs for the diagnosis of lung cancer [ 17 , 18 , 24 , 25 , 27 ], CACs have the potential to become a better novel diagnostic marker of lung cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the diagnostic value of CACs in comparison with other traditional biomarkers has been confirmed using a cohort of patients with lung nodules, which is an independent validation to the work conducted by Ye et al [ 24 ]. In the present study, the highest diagnostic efficiency was achieved when a CAC counts of 3 was chosen as the cut-off value, this result is similar to the study conducted by Qiu [ 25 ] and Ye [ 18 ] et al Overall, CAC counts presented better diagnostic value than commonly used tumour markers (CEA, CYFRA21–1, and NSE), which agrees with the results of several studies reporting the advantages of CACs for the diagnosis of lung cancer [ 17 , 18 , 24 , 25 , 27 ], CACs have the potential to become a better novel diagnostic marker of lung cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Therefore, the traditional mode of small lung nodule diagnosis should be investigated. Previous works as well as this work suggest that CACs are an ideal candidate marker, as such a test only requires the simple process of blood collection and its accuracy has been reported in early lung cancer patients [ 18 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The blood-based 4-color FISH method for the identification of CACs was possible to achieve undisputed detection results, which identified CACs by analyzing the number of fluorescence signals in the different channels according to the identification rules, as presented in Table 1. The method could accurately identify patients with lung cancer by enabling a reduction in the frequency of non-malignant nodules biopsied, which has been applied in clinical practice (32)(33)(34)(35)(36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals who are not prepared to conceive could be directed to regenerative endocrinology and infertility hospitals for further fertility alternatives such as storing embryos, oocytes, and other reproduction components [ 15 ]. There have been no randomized control trials specifically compared the impact of laparoscopy for harmless ovarian tumors in pregnant upon mother as well as fetal health or treatment adherence [ 16 ]. They used ROC curves as well as regression analysis to identify the optimum mixtures of 5 serological tests to cancer screening in diverse communities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%