2019
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa18060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Digital Remote Wireless Microphone Technology in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Recipients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data are in agreement with previous studies demonstrating the successful application of ADMT in adults with bilaterally and unilaterally hearing impairment who use hearing aid(s) and CI (s). 21,22,[28][29][30][31] Furthermore, we have been able to expand previous findings demonstrating the benefit of frequency modulation technology and ADMT in bilaterally hearingimpaired children 19,[32][33][34] to children with SSD. The extension to children with SSD who use a CI has a direct clinical impact, as remote wireless technology can and should be considered for children with SSD who use a CI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our data are in agreement with previous studies demonstrating the successful application of ADMT in adults with bilaterally and unilaterally hearing impairment who use hearing aid(s) and CI (s). 21,22,[28][29][30][31] Furthermore, we have been able to expand previous findings demonstrating the benefit of frequency modulation technology and ADMT in bilaterally hearingimpaired children 19,[32][33][34] to children with SSD. The extension to children with SSD who use a CI has a direct clinical impact, as remote wireless technology can and should be considered for children with SSD who use a CI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…21 In a later examination, Wesarg et al 22 revealed better speech recognition with the application of ADMT at the NH ear or bilaterally than at the CI alone in adults with SSD show use a CI. The different benefits of alternating ADMT application might be attributable to different speech recognition with the CI between the populations included in the two studies of Wesarg et al 21,22 Speech recognition with the CI (no ADMT) was superior on average in the cohort of the previous study than in the following study. 21,22 In the present investigation, only a trend was seen for the correlation between speech recognition in NH þ CI/A for a frontal speaker and word recognition at 65 dB SPL with the CI alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations