Application of ELECTRE I Method to Restoration Actions in Telecommunication Network Maintenance

Data quality assessment of maintenance reporting procedures

“…Critical Component Identification (Dehghania et al, 2012) (Cavalcante et al , 2007) Measuring/Assessment Efficiency (Wang et al, 2010) (Muchiri et al, 2011;Vujanovićet al, 2012;Van & Pintelon, 2014) Sun (2004); Peck et al (1998);Ozbek et al (2010a,b); Hjalmarsson et al (1996); Liu & Yu (2004); Rouse et al (2002);Fallah-Fini et al (2015); Jeon et al (2011);Roll et al (1989); Charnes et al (1984) (de un Caso, 2008) (e Costa et al, 2012) Maintenance Action Selection (Kumar & Maiti, 2012) (Alarcón et al, 2007;Thor et al, 2013) Tan et al (2011);Fouladgar et al (2012) developed MCDM-based maintenance policy selection frameworks taking into account maintenance cost, addedvalue and safety dimensions. Shahin et al (2012) rather focused on the selection of appropriate (optimum) maintenance strategies, paying special attention to reliability, availability and maintainability criteria and potential interdependencies (via ANP).…”

“…Along with critical component identification comes the challenge of making the right decisions and actions on the field to avoid causing any disruption, delay or monetary loss. A few studies have been using MCDM techniques to select the best maintenance action(s) on-site, such as Nyström & Söderholm (2010) who are seeking to improve railway track maintenance practices, or still Alarcón et al (2007) who apply ELECTRE for minimizing telecommunication network disruption during maintenance activities.…”

Algoritmos de decisión para priorizar las acciones de restauración en el mantenimiento de redes

“…Incluye la definición de unos criterios suficientemente genéricos para posibilitar una amplia aplicación en las diferentes compañías operadoras. Esta parte ha dado lugar a dos publicaciones [55] y [56].…”