2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-012-9448-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Matrix Solid-Phase Dispersion and Liquid Chromatography–Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry for the Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Fruits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has been successfully applied for years in the analysis of different pesticide groups (high polarity, acidic or basic pesticides) [11–14]. In addition to these methods, matrix solid‐phase dispersion has been used in many studies to isolate pesticides from food samples [15–18]. In recent years, easy, inexpensive, and environmentally friendly microextraction methods such as SPME [19, 20], dispersive liquid‐liquid microextraction (DLLME) [21, 22], single drop microextraction [23], hollow fiber‐liquid phase microextraction [24], ultrasonically‐assisted emulsifier microextraction [25], vortex‐assisted LLME [26] and air‐assisted LLME [27] are used in the analysis of pesticides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been successfully applied for years in the analysis of different pesticide groups (high polarity, acidic or basic pesticides) [11–14]. In addition to these methods, matrix solid‐phase dispersion has been used in many studies to isolate pesticides from food samples [15–18]. In recent years, easy, inexpensive, and environmentally friendly microextraction methods such as SPME [19, 20], dispersive liquid‐liquid microextraction (DLLME) [21, 22], single drop microextraction [23], hollow fiber‐liquid phase microextraction [24], ultrasonically‐assisted emulsifier microextraction [25], vortex‐assisted LLME [26] and air‐assisted LLME [27] are used in the analysis of pesticides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, our novel method provides lower limit of detection (LOD) than those of LPME (Peng et al 2007). Compared with SPME (Wu et al 2012;Radišić et al 2013) and DLLME-HPLC , although our LOD was slightly higher, the extraction time was shorter in our method. This result indicated that the developed method had the merits of improved simplicity and sensitivity.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Methods Performancementioning
confidence: 81%
“…DLLME offers significant advantages including simplicity, easy handling, cost-effectiveness, rapidity, limited consumption of organic solvents, and high enrichment capabilities. These features have attracted the interest of many research groups, and DLLME has been applied for the extraction of triazines from different matrixes (Radišić et al 2013;Wu et al 2012;Zhang and Xu 2014;Andruch et al 2013;Wang et al 2014). Of course, like other analytical methods, DLLME also has its drawbacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been conducted to determine tebufenozide in different matrices using many extraction methods including vortex, ultrasound, oscillation, and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), dispersive solid phase extraction (dSPE), hollow fibre liquid phase micro‐extraction (HF‐LPME), ionic liquid assisted liquid micro‐extraction (IL‐VALLME) and accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) . Several detection methods have been implemented for the analysis of tebufenozide including gas chromatography (GC), high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (LC–MS), gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC–MS), liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS), gas chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (GC–MS/MS), and micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography . For example, Araujo et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%