2022
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2022.2107714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of MCDM methods for flood susceptibility assessment and evaluation the impacts of past experiences on flood preparedness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mitra et al (2022) claimed the TOPSIS model is highly recommended for flood susceptibility analysis in the sub-Himalayan region based on MAE, MSE, and RMSE. Also, Pathan et al (2022) and Hadian et al (2022) revealed that the TOPSIS approach estimates more precise flood risk coverage than the other MCDM approaches. According to Mousavi et al (2022), TOPSIS is more accurate because it can apply discrete alternative challenges, which are the most crucial methods for resolving problems in the real world, and recognize viable alternatives right away.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Mitra et al (2022) claimed the TOPSIS model is highly recommended for flood susceptibility analysis in the sub-Himalayan region based on MAE, MSE, and RMSE. Also, Pathan et al (2022) and Hadian et al (2022) revealed that the TOPSIS approach estimates more precise flood risk coverage than the other MCDM approaches. According to Mousavi et al (2022), TOPSIS is more accurate because it can apply discrete alternative challenges, which are the most crucial methods for resolving problems in the real world, and recognize viable alternatives right away.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The results showed the most prominent flood zones. Hadian et al [27] analysed the flood risks using TOPSIS and Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC). They also developed a map showing distribution of high-risk regions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Lee et al constructed an MCDM tool based on socio-economic development and climate change in a certain area of Seoul, South Korea to assess local flood vulnerability [19]. Sanaz Hadian et al drew a flood risk map of Mazandaran Province, Iran, based on MCDM and analyzed the local residents' ability to cope with flood disasters [20]. Kelly et al developed a large-scale flood risk assessment tool based on MCDM and analyzed flood risks in Australia [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%