Application of Motion Effect Evaluation Algorithm Based on Random Forest

Abstract

The development of big data technology makes the feature selection technology gradually perfect. The advantages of different feature selection technologies are different. Among them, random forest algorithm belongs to integrated feature selection algorithm. Integrated processing of classification results can screen out the most representative feature impact. Based on this background and random forest algorithm, this paper analyzes the evaluation of motion effect. After the measurement, this paper obtains the body data before and after the training. After the calculation, the change data of the body index are determined. The random forest feature selection method is used as the carrier to determine the corresponding index attribute set. In the process of data set input, the corresponding whole input data set is formed through data classification. The completion of training, through the comparative experiment, is conducive to clear the degree of influence of physical indicators and then complete the exercise effect evaluation. The research shows that the random forest algorithm has significant advantages in the evaluation of sports effect and can effectively improve the accuracy of classification.

Retracted: Application of Motion Effect Evaluation Algorithm Based on Random Forest

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”