Application of novel DIRF feature selection algorithm for automated brain disease detection

Yaman, Süleyman; Ünlü, Elif Işılay; Güler, Hasan; Şengür, Abdulkadir; Acharya, U. Rajendra

doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105006

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… + + [ 44 ] 2020 Herzog, L + − + + [ 45 ] 2019 Bizzo, B + ? + + [ 46 ] 2007 Uchiyama, Y + + + + Overall high risk of bias [ 47 ] 2023 Yaman, S − − ? + [ 48 ] 2022 Arnold, T − ?…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Artificial intelligence for MRI stroke detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Bojsen,

Elhakim,

Graumann

et al. 2024

Insights Imaging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the stroke detection performance of artificial intelligence (AI) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and additionally to identify reporting insufficiencies. Methods PRISMA guidelines were followed. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, and IEEE Xplore were searched for studies utilising MRI and AI for stroke detection. The protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021289748). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were the primary outcomes. Only studies using MRI in adults were included. The intervention was AI for stroke detection with ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in separate categories. Any manual labelling was used as a comparator. A modified QUADAS-2 tool was used for bias assessment. The minimum information about clinical artificial intelligence modelling (MI-CLAIM) checklist was used to assess reporting insufficiencies. Meta-analyses were performed for sensitivity, specificity, and hierarchical summary ROC (HSROC) on low risk of bias studies. Results Thirty-three studies were eligible for inclusion. Fifteen studies had a low risk of bias. Low-risk studies were better for reporting MI-CLAIM items. Only one study examined a CE-approved AI algorithm. Forest plots revealed detection sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 93% with identical performance in the HSROC analysis and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 12.6 and 0.079. Conclusion Current AI technology can detect ischaemic stroke in MRI. There is a need for further validation of haemorrhagic detection. The clinical usability of AI stroke detection in MRI is yet to be investigated. Critical relevance statement This first meta-analysis concludes that AI, utilising diffusion-weighted MRI sequences, can accurately aid the detection of ischaemic brain lesions and its clinical utility is ready to be uncovered in clinical trials. Key Points There is a growing interest in AI solutions for detection aid. The performance is unknown for MRI stroke assessment. AI detection sensitivity and specificity were 93% and 93% for ischaemic lesions. There is limited evidence for the detection of patients with haemorrhagic lesions. AI can accurately detect patients with ischaemic stroke in MRI. Graphical Abstract

show abstract

“… + + [ 44 ] 2020 Herzog, L + − + + [ 45 ] 2019 Bizzo, B + ? + + [ 46 ] 2007 Uchiyama, Y + + + + Overall high risk of bias [ 47 ] 2023 Yaman, S − − ? + [ 48 ] 2022 Arnold, T − ?…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%