2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the discontinuous deformation analysis method to stress wave propagation through a one-dimensional rock mass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is thus obvious that [13,14,16,18] both the average acceleration method ( = 1/4, = 1/2) and the constant acceleration method ( = 1/2, = 1) meet the unconditionally stable condition, while the linear acceleration method ( = 1/6, = 1/2) and the central difference method ( = 0, = 1/2) are the conditionally stable method. In general, the accuracy of Newmark method depends on the time interval, the physical parameters of the system, and the loading condition.…”
Section: Algorithmic Damping Of the Newmark Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is thus obvious that [13,14,16,18] both the average acceleration method ( = 1/4, = 1/2) and the constant acceleration method ( = 1/2, = 1) meet the unconditionally stable condition, while the linear acceleration method ( = 1/6, = 1/2) and the central difference method ( = 0, = 1/2) are the conditionally stable method. In general, the accuracy of Newmark method depends on the time interval, the physical parameters of the system, and the loading condition.…”
Section: Algorithmic Damping Of the Newmark Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hatzor et al [11] and Tsesarsky et al [5] obtained that 2% kinetic damping was the correct number for the dynamic analysis of a single block on an inclined subjected to dynamic loading. However, the significance of the kinetic damping is still not clear, and the value of initial velocity discounted is hard to choose; therefore, some researchers have introduced self-adaptive damping [12] and viscous damping [13,14] to address these problems. Lin and Xie [15] also analyzed the performance of Newmark time integration with kinetic damping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the artificial damping, a simple viscous damping term as shown in Equation is used in the CA, NPC, and MNPC approaches. For SDOF system, the viscous damping ratio ξ viscous related with damping coefficient gg in Equation can be represented in the following format, ξviscous=()1italicgg24normalΩ. The parameter gg in Equation can be set to a value ranging from 0 to 1. For quasi‐static analysis, it is usually set to 0 to dissipate the kinetic energy of the system.…”
Section: Properties Of the New Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For quasi‐static analysis, it is usually set to 0 to dissipate the kinetic energy of the system. For dynamic analysis, the coupling effects of damping by the time integration approach and viscous terms in CA approach are similar to that of Rayleigh damping . In the CD approach, the local damping and global damping are used for quasi‐static simulation, while the Rayleigh damping are commonly applied for dynamic problems…”
Section: Properties Of the New Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation