2015
DOI: 10.1088/1742-2132/12/6/909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the fractal method to determine the membership function parameter for geoelectrical data (case study: Hamyj copper deposit, Iran)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A–D, respectively. Based on the inversion results, maximum depth of investigations in P1, P2 and P3 reaches to 70 m and in P3, maximum depth investigation is approximately 125 m. Anomaly values were defined based on the fractal methods, and therefore concentration‐area methods (Ferdows and Ramazi ) has been used for separation of the anomalous value from the background. The obtained threshold is correlated with drilling results and then modified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A–D, respectively. Based on the inversion results, maximum depth of investigations in P1, P2 and P3 reaches to 70 m and in P3, maximum depth investigation is approximately 125 m. Anomaly values were defined based on the fractal methods, and therefore concentration‐area methods (Ferdows and Ramazi ) has been used for separation of the anomalous value from the background. The obtained threshold is correlated with drilling results and then modified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several different geophysical methods for mineral exploration; therefore, the selection of geophysical method(s) depends on the physical properties of the exploration target and its accompanied rocks, geological and topographical conditions (e.g., Sultan et al 2009;Ramazi and Mostafaei 2013;Gurin et al 2015;Zhang et al 2018). Integration of induced polarization (IP) and electrical resistivity (ER) is the best selection for copper mineralization exploration (e.g., Chen and Tsao 2001;Flores and Peralta-Ortega 2009;Mamo 2013;Ferdows and Ramazi 2015a;Mashhadi and Ramazi 2018;. IP and ER methods are among the most applicable geophysical methods used in subsurface studies notably for selection of the best drilling points for exploration purposes (Bishop and Emerson 1999;Wynn and Grosz 2000;Ferdows and Ramazi 2015b;Hope and Andersson 2016).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anomaly values were defined based on the fractal methods. Due to the data, the "concentration-area" method (Ferdows and Ramazi, 2015) has been used in this research for separation of the anomalous value from the background. The obtained threshold correlated with drilling results and the obtained threshold was modified.…”
Section: Inversion Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%