Applied behavior analysis in flying training research.

Bailey, Jon S.; Hughes, Ronald G.

doi:10.1037/e402582004-001

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several reports by R. G. Hughes and his colleagues (Bailey & Hughes, 1980;Bailey, Hughes, & Jones, 1980;Hughes, 1979;Hughes, Hannon, & Jones, 1979;Hughes, Lintern, Wightman, & Brooks, 1981) do provide conceptual models for AIF-based simulator training programs and present experimental evidence aimed dt determining the training value of particular features, but much additional work is needed if military ATDs are to be more than mere substitute weapon systems.…”

Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Aircrew Training Devices: Utility and Utilization of Advanced Instructional Features

Polzella¹,

Hubbard²,

Brown³

et al. 1987

PsycEXTRA Dataset

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Aircrew Training Devices: Utility and Utilization of Advanced Instructional Features

Polzella¹,

Hubbard²,

Brown³

et al. 1987

PsycEXTRA Dataset

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…AIF utility information is available in an impdrtant series of reports by R. G. Hughes et al (Bailey & Hughes, 1980;Bailey, Hughes, & Jones, 1980;Hughes, 1979;Hughes, Hannon, & Jones, 1979;Hughes, Lintern, Wightman, Brooks, & Singleton, 1982). The reports provide conceptual models for AIF-based simulator training programs and present experimental evidence aimed at determining the training value of particular features.…”

Section: Monitoring Featuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Aircrew training devices: Utility and utilization of advanced instructional features: Phase IV: Summary report.

Polzella¹

1987

PsycEXTRA Dataset

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern aircrew training devices (ATDs) are equipped with sophisticated hardware and software capabilities, known as advanced instructional features (AIFs), that permit a simulator instructor to prepare briefings, manage training, vary task difficulty/fidelity, monitor performande, and provide feedback for flight simulation training missions. The utility and use of the AIF capabilities of Air Force ATDs were explored by means of a survey of 534 simulator instructors from Air Training Command, Military Airlift Command, Strategic Air Command, and Tactical Air Command training sites. The primary purpose of the survey was to provide a database that could be used in defining the requirements for ATD procurement and in developing future ATD training programs. The results indicated that, in general, the features that were rated highest were those used for training management, variation of task difficulty/fidelity, and monitoring student performance. The level of AIF use was affected somewhat by hardware and/or software unreliability, implementation time, functional limitations, and design deficiencies. However, the presumed training value of an AIF was the most important determinant of its use. Recommendations were made concerning the AIF capabilities of future ATDS and research aimed at determining the principles of effective AIF use. The survey instruments are appended.

show abstract

Applied behavior analysis in flying training research.

Cited by 2 publications

References 6 publications

Aircrew Training Devices: Utility and Utilization of Advanced Instructional Features

Aircrew Training Devices: Utility and Utilization of Advanced Instructional Features

Aircrew training devices: Utility and utilization of advanced instructional features: Phase IV: Summary report.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About