2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying a linguistic multi-criteria decision-making model to the analysis of ICT suppliers’ offers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, many different MCDM methods are used to solve the supplier selection problem. For example, the best worst method (Rezaei et al, 2016), linguistic MCDM method (Cid-Lopez et al, 2016), fuzzy EDAS , TOPSIS-MMD (Aouadni et al, 2017), intuitionistic VIKOR (Zhao et al, 2017), fuzzy Rasch based COPRAS-G (Chatterjee & Kar, 2018) and neutrosophic DEMATEL (Abdel-Basset et al, 2018). The green supplier selection problem takes into account also environmental factors, unlike the common supplier selection problem.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, many different MCDM methods are used to solve the supplier selection problem. For example, the best worst method (Rezaei et al, 2016), linguistic MCDM method (Cid-Lopez et al, 2016), fuzzy EDAS , TOPSIS-MMD (Aouadni et al, 2017), intuitionistic VIKOR (Zhao et al, 2017), fuzzy Rasch based COPRAS-G (Chatterjee & Kar, 2018) and neutrosophic DEMATEL (Abdel-Basset et al, 2018). The green supplier selection problem takes into account also environmental factors, unlike the common supplier selection problem.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ordinal fuzzy linguistic approach, linguistic variables take values from an ordered set of linguistic labels . This approach is suitable in many contexts . Nevertheless, an important drawback of the ordinal fuzzy linguistic approach is the loss of information when the problem requires to aggregate linguistic variables, making this approach inappropriate in some scenarios .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last step consists of finding the best alternative among a set of feasible alternatives by transforming the evaluation matrix into a score using approaches that are specific to the different MCDA methods, such as AHP and TOPSIS. According to the literature, there are a large number of MCDA methods available [26,29,30]. Table 2 presents a summary of some of the most popular examples of them.…”
Section: Fundamental Questions Of Offloading Process Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%