2018
DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2018.1515062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying analytic hierarchy process to the evaluation of double skin façades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that a box window is the best alternative according to three criteria (noise and thermal insulation, fire protection). The results of the study were compared with previous research, where double-skin façades were evaluated with the AHP method [46]. The ranking of alternatives was unchanged.…”
Section: Fuzzy Ahp National Turkeymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that a box window is the best alternative according to three criteria (noise and thermal insulation, fire protection). The results of the study were compared with previous research, where double-skin façades were evaluated with the AHP method [46]. The ranking of alternatives was unchanged.…”
Section: Fuzzy Ahp National Turkeymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nadoushani et al (2017) studied the multi-criteria selection of fac xade systems and used the AHP method to identify the weights of sustainability criteria and rank the alternatives. Bostancioglu and Onder (2019) also analyzed double skin fac xade by using the AHP method to evaluate questionnaire responses from experienced professionals. Siksnelyte-Butkiene et al (2021) highlighted in their review that one-third of the material selection studies used the AHP method for evaluation and mainly the half of the studies which focused on sustainability criteria preferred the AHP method due to its hierarchical structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proven, among other things, that this method can be used to determine the weighting of safety factors on construction sites with tower cranes [44]. Furthermore, it has been applied to the evaluation of double skin facades, building fire safety management, and safety risk assessment for planning and budgeting of construction projects [45][46][47]. Moreover, the AHP-Gray model was successfully used to evaluate the safety of construction [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%