2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2003.tb01103.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

67
6,336
4
381

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,277 publications
(6,788 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
67
6,336
4
381
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Fit statistics were used to examine how well the data from participants and items met the model assumptions. 15 The item-respondent map was inspected to evaluate content representation of each item to ensure items and respondents were appropriately targeted. 15 Further analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows (Version 17, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14 Fit statistics were used to examine how well the data from participants and items met the model assumptions. 15 The item-respondent map was inspected to evaluate content representation of each item to ensure items and respondents were appropriately targeted. 15 Further analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows (Version 17, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 The item-respondent map was inspected to evaluate content representation of each item to ensure items and respondents were appropriately targeted. 15 Further analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows (Version 17, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Factor analysis was performed to assess the unidimensionality of the SCI-FCS and to identify underlying dimensions of concern about falling in people with SCI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Andrich rating scale model was adopted. 13 The technicalities of Rasch modeling are now accessible to lay professionals in simple textbooks 18,19 and in articles conceived for professionals working in diverse fields such as education 20 and rehabilitation. 9 Several dedicated and increasingly user-friendly software programs are also available (see www.rasch.org for an overview on software and training opportunities).…”
Section: Agreement (Fit) Between Actual and Expected Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the mean item difficulty is contrasted across two classes of patients, location of the difficulty measures should fall within the 95% confidence bands surrounding the identity line ( Figure 4). 15,18,19 Six countries were included in this study, making the analysis of country-DIF more complex. The average difficulty of each item within each subscale was Figure 2 (a) The items feeding, bathing, and grooming share the same category structure within the self-care SCIM scale.…”
Section: Agreement (Fit) Between Actual and Expected Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When data fit the Rasch model well, fit statistics will fall within an acceptable range of 0.6-1.4 (Linacre and Wright, 1994). Because infit statistics are weighted locally, they are less susceptible to outlier influences than outfit statistics and generally preferred (Bond and Fox, 2001). Therefore, we eliminated those items whose infit statistics fell outside of the acceptable range but retained those items with acceptable infit but poor outfit statistics.…”
Section: Data Analysis Planmentioning
confidence: 99%