2013
DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2013.850188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approach to improving the quality of data used to analyse dams – illustrations by two methods

Abstract: Assessing the safety of a civil engineering structure requires using a large quantity of data. These data are frequently "imperfect", meaning that they comprise uncertainty, imprecision and incompleteness. It is important to develop systems for assessing and controlling these imperfections in order to both quantify the quality of the data used to evaluate the condition of structures and decide on the corrective actions to reduce these imperfections. Here, we propose a generic approach to controlling the qualit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, these data have potentially different characteristics and formats, are dynamic and contain imperfections (imprecision, uncertainties, incompleteness and conflicts between data) (Curt & Gervais, 2014). In order to exploit them, collection methods and tools, processing and possibly the combination of heterogeneous, dynamic and imperfect data must therefore be proposed.…”
Section: Directions Of Research Concerning Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, these data have potentially different characteristics and formats, are dynamic and contain imperfections (imprecision, uncertainties, incompleteness and conflicts between data) (Curt & Gervais, 2014). In order to exploit them, collection methods and tools, processing and possibly the combination of heterogeneous, dynamic and imperfect data must therefore be proposed.…”
Section: Directions Of Research Concerning Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data usually present imperfect features: imprecision, uncertainty and incompleteness. We combined the knowledge-based method and possibility theory for assessing dam performance (Curt, 2013;Curt and Gervais, 2014). The system developed is capable of modeling, aggregating heterogeneous imperfect information, and representing expert knowledge.…”
Section: The Issue Of Dam Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 Experts use performance assessment to monitor dam safety and recommend corrective actions if necessary. Corrective actions are of various types and concern both the technical components of the dam and the measurement system (Curt and Talon, 2013;Curt and Gervais, 2014): emergency action (partial or complete emptying of the reservoir), major reconstruction, rehabilitation or safety projects, maintenance actions (scraping of the dowstream slope, drain outlet cleaning, renewal of monitoring equipment and so forth), upgrading dam performance monitoring (increasing measurement frequency, performing laboratory tests and so forth). The objective is twofold: to improve the measurement system (for instance, the scraping of the downstream shoulder allows better visual observations, the renewal of an monitoring device allows obtaining reliable data, etc.)…”
Section: Name Leakage On the Downstream Embankment Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dabous & Alkass, 2010;Rashidi & Lemass, 2011), dams (e.g. Curt & Gervais, 2014) and sewage systems (e.g. Tagherouit, Bennis, & Bengassem, 2011).…”
Section: Overview Of Criteria For Inspection and Maintenance Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%