Approaches to Identifying the Periphery and Peripheralization in the Space of Modern Russia

Anokhin, A. A.; Kuzin, V. Yu.

doi:10.1134/s2079970519040026

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For all the chosen components of territorial capital, significant levels of spatial heterogeneity were detected. These findings agree with those of Belyaeva et al (2021), Anokhin and Kuzin (2019). They also support the evidence of Fedorov (2019) and Treivish (2020), who point out a significant level of polarization of Russia's space combined with the scarcity of concentration areas capable of performing the functions of growth centres.…”

Section: Areas Of Concentrationsupporting

confidence: 89%

Territorial capital of Russian regions and its spatial organization

Suvorova

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Relevance. The new challenges that exacerbate long-standing issues stimulate the Russian economic system to evolve faster and to seek greater efficiency. One of the impediments to this process, however, is the inertness of the spatial organization of the national economy. There is a need for more detailed research on the characteristics of the national economic space for evidence-based policy-making in the sphere of spatial development. Research objective The study aims to describe the organization of Russia's economic space by focusing on the patterns of localization of its territorial capital. Data and methods. The study uses official statistical data on Russian regions provided by the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) and a set of indicators of regional inequality. Methodologically, the study relies on the methods of spatial autocorrelation analysis and cartographic analysis. Results. It has been shown that there are significant regional disparities combined with the high level of polarization of the Russian space. There is a scarcity of asset concentration areas, which are mostly located in the country's western part, leaving the eastern part lagging behind and limiting its potential. The territories that are struggling the most are those devoid of resources and located remotely from the areas of asset concentration. The patterns of geographic distribution of gross regional product are to a great extent similar to the patterns of distribution of production capital, which may point to the existence of factors leading to regional divergence. The distribution of creative capital in Russia is far from optimal, which prevents it from becoming a major driver behind the country's economic growth. Conclusions. Policy-makers need to take into account the patterns of asset distribution in devising measures for enhancing territorial capital and setting priorities for the country's economic spatial development.

show abstract

Section: Areas Of Concentrationsupporting

confidence: 89%

Territorial capital of Russian regions and its spatial organization

Suvorova

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Высокий уровень централизации российской системы исследований 2 [22], а также разрывы в уровне социально-экономического развития отдельных регионов России препятствуют обра-зованию единого поля хозяйственных и социальных процессов [23]. В силу слабости собственного потенциала российская периферия не в состоянии выступать самостоятельным аттрактором ресурсов социально-экономического развития [24]. Согласно исследованию А.Н.…”

unclassified

Methods of spatial scientometrics in assessing the heterogeneity of the innovation space of Russia

2019

P Sci Edu

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Знания и инновации характеризуются неравномерным распределением в границах территории. Аналогично «парадоксу береговой линии», фрагментарность их распределения усиливается с расширением детализации исследования. Ключевые в контексте национальной инновационной системы регионы могут иметь в своей структуре «белые пятна» с ярко выраженной поляризацией в пользу крупных городов и агломераций. Города как центры притяжения образовательной, научноисследовательской и технологической деятельности, аккумулируют интеллектуальный потенциал страны и обеспечивают кластеризацию инновационной активности. В контексте региональной инновационной политики метрополизация рассматривается как объективный фактор аккумуляции интеллектуального и «знаниевого» капитала в городах, позволяющий обеспечить концентрацию ресурсов развития на наиболее перспективных и «рентабельных» направлениях. Побочным эффектом подобного подхода может стать усиление региональной дивергенции в области знаний, инноваций и технологий, а также «вымывание» ресурсов малых и средних городов. Нами проведена верификация устоявшегося мнения о периферийности малых и средних городов в инновационном пространстве России. Методология исследования основана на инструментах наукометрического анализа, доступных в аналитическом инструменте SciVal. Проанализированы все городские населенные пункты России, с последующей фокусировкой на 120 городах, генерирующих не менее 100 результатов интеллектуальной деятельности в период с 2013 по 2017 с индексацией в международной реферативной базой Scopus. Пространственная наукометрия позволяет сформировать динамические ряды данных о географии знания и инноваций в России, используя населенные пункты в качестве объекта исследования. Результаты показывают, что национальная инновационная система России представляет собой сложную экосистему взаимозависимых элементов (полюсов роста, зон влияния, инновационной периферии), в которой малые города играют важную роль как в качестве звеньев инновационного процесса, так и в качестве самодостаточных центров глобальной сети исследований и разработок.

show abstract

The Quantitative Indicator-Based Evaluation for Rural Development

Stankulova,

Barreca,

Rebaudengo

et al. 2024

International Regional Science Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The last century has been characterised by very fast industrialisation and population growth, causing strong outmigration from the rural territories, further increasing the socio-economic gap between the rural and urban areas. To counteract these problems, a lot of scholars have started studying rural development and the methodologies that could be applied to its evaluation. The main research objective of the present work is to investigate on a worldwide scale how rural development is being evaluated and, more in detail, to study the quantitative indicator-based approaches used for this kind of evaluation. Bibliometric analysis was performed with the aim of understanding in a better way the state of the scientific development of the research topic. Its duality, reflected by the nature of the phenomenon (negative or positive) from which the studies have origin from, has been confirmed. During the process of research has also encountered a new perspective – a more neutral one, with central concept the quality of life. Regarding the study of the quantitative indicator-based approaches, 47 selected papers have been analysed in detail and an extensive database containing 32 dimensions, 72 sub-dimensions and 892 indicators was created. Some universal dimensions and indicators have been encountered, although it cannot be known whether they are truly comparable due to the lack of transparency present in different research. For the future development and dissemination of these approaches, it is necessary to achieve greater transparency in how they are calculated and greater availability of open data.

show abstract

Approaches to Identifying the Periphery and Peripheralization in the Space of Modern Russia

Cited by 5 publications

References 8 publications

Territorial capital of Russian regions and its spatial organization

Territorial capital of Russian regions and its spatial organization

Methods of spatial scientometrics in assessing the heterogeneity of the innovation space of Russia

The Quantitative Indicator-Based Evaluation for Rural Development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About