1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf01333248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate solutions for drag coefficient of bubbles moving in shear-thinning elastic fluids

Abstract: Abstract:The drag coefficient for bubbles with mobile or immobile interface rising in shear-thinning elastic fluids described by an Ellis or a Carreau model is discussed. Approximate solutions based on linearization of the equations of motion are presented for the highly elastic region of flow. These solutions are in reasonably good agreement with the theoretical predictions based on variational principles and with published experimental data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of the characteristic parameters A and n of the Carreau equation on the drag coefficient is shown in Figure 1 for a single bubble and in Figure 2 for a swarm of bubbles when gas holdup is equal to 0.2 or 0.4. Predictions of the appropriate expression of Kawase and Moo-Young (1985) (Equation (16) of their paper), also shown in Figure 1, are in reasonable agreement with the variational solution if the shear thinning behaviour is not pronounced; however the results differ more markedly for larger values of the characteristic time parameter A and lower values of n . In general, the values of the drag coefficient predicted by Kawase and Moo-Young expression for bubbles with mobile interface are lower than those obtained from the variational algorithm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effect of the characteristic parameters A and n of the Carreau equation on the drag coefficient is shown in Figure 1 for a single bubble and in Figure 2 for a swarm of bubbles when gas holdup is equal to 0.2 or 0.4. Predictions of the appropriate expression of Kawase and Moo-Young (1985) (Equation (16) of their paper), also shown in Figure 1, are in reasonable agreement with the variational solution if the shear thinning behaviour is not pronounced; however the results differ more markedly for larger values of the characteristic time parameter A and lower values of n . In general, the values of the drag coefficient predicted by Kawase and Moo-Young expression for bubbles with mobile interface are lower than those obtained from the variational algorithm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Later studies covered the creeping flow of an Ellis fluid past a Newtonian fluid sphere (Mohan and Venkateswarlu, 1976b;Mohan and Raghuraman, 1976) and multiple bubble motion in a power law fluid (Bhavaraju et al, 1978;Kawase and Ulbrecht, 1981a). The most recent investigations deal with slow flow of a Carreau fluid over a single rigid spherical particle (Chhabra and Uhlherr, 1980;Bush and Phan-Thien, 1984), over an assemblage of particles (Chhabra and Raguraman, 1984) and over gas bubbles (Kawase and Moo-Young, 1985). The latter problem is of potential interest in viscous fermentation problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen that the effect of shear-thinning is more pronounced for a sphere than for a bubble. Kawase and Moo-Young (1985) obtained approximate expressions for the drag coefficient in the case of bubbles and spheres moving in a Carreau fluid. Their expressions for a sphere and a bubble are respectively:…”
Section: Rodrigue Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is well-known, a large number of investigations concerning various aspects of the bubble or drop motion in shear-thinning fluids has been reported theoretically and experimentally (e.g., [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] for bubble motions and [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] for drop motions) in the past. Many of the most important results have been well summarized and reviewed by Chhabra [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%