2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-11496-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aquatic plants and ecotoxicological assessment in freshwater ecosystems: a review

Abstract: This paper reviews the current state-of-the-art, limitations, critical issues, and new directions in freshwater plant ecotoxicology. We selected peer-reviewed studies using relevant databases and for each (1) publication year, (2) test plant species, (3) reference plant group (microalgae, macroalgae, bryophytes, pteridophytes, flowering plants), (4) toxicant tested (heavy metal, pharmaceutical product, hydrocarbon, pesticide, surfactant, plastic), (5) experiment site (laboratory, field), and (6) toxicant expos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
(155 reference statements)
0
23
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparatively increased germination and reduced phytotoxic analysis of the five crops for the treated wastewater is as follows: Cauliflower > Radish > Wheat > Rice > Hot pepper. The capacity to accumulate heavy metals is different in various types of plants, both on land as well as in aquatic plants [82,83]. Leafy and root vegetable crops absorb these metals more frequently than other vegetables [82].…”
Section: Rice Cropmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparatively increased germination and reduced phytotoxic analysis of the five crops for the treated wastewater is as follows: Cauliflower > Radish > Wheat > Rice > Hot pepper. The capacity to accumulate heavy metals is different in various types of plants, both on land as well as in aquatic plants [82,83]. Leafy and root vegetable crops absorb these metals more frequently than other vegetables [82].…”
Section: Rice Cropmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased built-up land use areas in the lake catchment are done at the expense of biodiversity, some EPS such as fishery, supporting and regulatory services such as water purification and carbon sequestration). Aquatic plants such as Pennisetum purpureum schumach, Phragmites mauritianu, Typha latifolia, and Cyperus papyrus play a significant role in climate regulation through carbon sequestration (Kayranli et al, 2010;Were et al, 2021), water quality purification through the removal of heavy metals (Bernardini et al, 2016;Ceschin et al, 2021;Parzych et al, 2016), fecal pathogens removal (Kipasika et al, 2016), nutrients regulation, habitant provision (Bornette & Puijalon, 2011) and flood regulation (Rooney et al, 2013;Scheffer et al, 2003;Wang et al, 2019). Aquatic plants such as Typha domingensis, Terminalia sericea, Azadirachta indica found in They culturally provide services to local communities and cure diseases such as bilharzia, pneumonia, diarrhea, antiseptic wounds, and Malaria (Pullanikkatil et al, 2018).…”
Section: Trade-offs Between Ecosystem Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the use of aquatic plants as biological models in eco-toxicological tests is limited if compared to animals, although contaminants mainly enter the ecosystem through such organisms, that are the rst and obligate step of the trophic chains (Ceschin et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the test organisms, plants are regarded as ideal assay systems for screening and monitoring mutagens in the environment, providing vital information from the viewpoint of preserving biodiversity and ecological resources (Panda and Panda 2002;Aksoy 2017). Plant organisms are affected by water pollution earlier than other organisms, since they are the rst interface between abiotic and biotic constituents of an ecosystem and, therefore, considered as early warning systems, essential for intercepting contaminations in advance (Ceschin et al 2020) In addition, AFLP can offer the possibility of detecting large portions of the genome at the populational level at relatively low cost (Caballero et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%