How Does the Galaxy Work? 2004
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-2620-x_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are All the DIGs the Same?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This set of data, fully reduced and calibrated, was divided into a number of spectra, covering five rows each. This value matches the seeing conditions during the observations and corresponds to 90 pc at a distance of 3.53 Mpc (Hidalgo-Gámez & Olofsson 1998). A total of 86 one-dimensional spectra were studied, covering eight slit positions throughout the galaxy.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This set of data, fully reduced and calibrated, was divided into a number of spectra, covering five rows each. This value matches the seeing conditions during the observations and corresponds to 90 pc at a distance of 3.53 Mpc (Hidalgo-Gámez & Olofsson 1998). A total of 86 one-dimensional spectra were studied, covering eight slit positions throughout the galaxy.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…First, it has a high gas content with a total gas mass of 2.45 × 10 8 M ⊙ (Hunter & Elmegreen 2004) and a star formation rate of 5 × 10 −3 M ⊙ yr −1 . Second, it is located at only 3.53 Mpc (Hidalgo-Gámez & Olofsson 1998); therefore, the DIG can be detected easily with medium-size telescopes and not very long integration times. Moreover, the spatial resolution is good enough to study the details of the DIG and differentiate it from the classical H ii regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing these results with previously determined B-band L − Z relations is difficult because the slope and intercept are sensitive to sample selec-tion effects (e.g., the distribution of absolute magnitudes) and, obviously, the adopted abundance calibration. For example, Tremonti et al (2004) Other studies have obtained L − Z relation slopes ranging from −0.149 dex mag −1 to −0.280 dex mag −1 Hidalgo-Gamez & Olofsson 1998;Lamareille et al 2004;Salzer et al 2005; van Zee & Haynes 2006; J. Moustakas et al, in prep.).…”
Section: Synthesis: Central and Characteristic Oxygenmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Over the last three decades, numerous studies have measured the oxygen and nitrogen abundances of H II regions in dwarf irregular galaxies (e.g., Alloin et al 1979;Lequeux et al 1979;Kinman & Davidson 1981;Campbell, Terlevich, & Melnick 1986;Garnett 1990;Miller & Hodge 1996;van Zee et al 1997a;Izotov & Thuan 1998;Hidalgo-Gámez & Olofsson 2002;Skillman, Côté, & Miller 2003;Lee, Grebel, & Hodge 2003;Lee, Salzer, & Melbourne 2004). Lequeux et al (1979) were the first to note a strong correlation between metallicity and mass, in the sense that more massive galaxies also have higher measured oxygen abundances (see also Kinman & Davidson 1981); Skillman et al (1989) determined that a stronger correlation was found between metallicity and luminosity (see also Richer & McCall 1995;Hunter & Hoffman 1999;Pilyugin 2001;Tremonti et al 2004, for an alternative view, see Hidalgo-Gámez & Olofsson 1998). However, despite extensive observational effort, the origin of the luminosity-metallicity relation is still poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%