2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2011.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are ceramics and bricks reliable absolute geomagnetic intensity carriers?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
29
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining the data from both analytical methods, a wide range of firing temperatures and atmospheres has been established, as expected, within the same kiln (Table 3). This result clearly is dependent upon the structural position of the presently studied material inside the kilns as well as the dimensions of the kilns (Figure 1, Table 1) as suggested also by Morales et al (2011). As mentioned above, all the places inside a kiln did not experience the same firing conditions; in conjunction with the fact that the time operation of the kiln is commonly long, its structural materials will have suffered the effects of repeated firing processes.…”
Section: Estimated Firing Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Combining the data from both analytical methods, a wide range of firing temperatures and atmospheres has been established, as expected, within the same kiln (Table 3). This result clearly is dependent upon the structural position of the presently studied material inside the kilns as well as the dimensions of the kilns (Figure 1, Table 1) as suggested also by Morales et al (2011). As mentioned above, all the places inside a kiln did not experience the same firing conditions; in conjunction with the fact that the time operation of the kiln is commonly long, its structural materials will have suffered the effects of repeated firing processes.…”
Section: Estimated Firing Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Several successful laboratory experiments provided reliable archaeointensity results (De Marco et al 2008a, b;Spatharas et al 2011). In cases of failure during the relevant experiment, the classical rock-magnetic protocols for sample preselection proved to be insufficient for reducing this failure, as suggested by Morales et al (2011). Possible explanations could be found among the mineralogical composition and the clay paste preparation of the samples as well as their firing conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…samples SKO5 and SKO3, Table 4). Differences in firing temperatures within the same production and their impact on archaeointensity calculations were suggested by Morales et al (2011). At the fragment level, Gosselain (1992) reported evidence for large scale differentiation in their physical characteristics and Livingstone Smith (2001) documented, on the basis of a large data set from 80 firing structures, the extended diversity and complexity of firing technologies.…”
Section: Implications For Pottery Selection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 98%