Are Charter Cities Legitimate?

Abstract

Political Science, NYU Abu Dhabi P OVERTY and underdevelopment are among the most pressing problems of our time. It has been persuasively argued that transfers of wealth and knowledge alone cannot solve these problems-it is also necessary to put in place political and legal institutions that will stimulate growth and development.1 But how to establish such institutions in the least developed parts of the world where regimes are often "extractive" and have no desire to see change?2 Revolution is difficult, and often accompanied by instability and violence, as recent events in the Middle East show. Nor can those living under oppressive regimes easily move to more desirable locations, as the travails of illegal migrants journeying to America and Europe remind us daily. It is entirely reasonable to demand that the developed world permit greater inward migration, especially in the form of guest worker programs.3 Yet the numbers involved are staggering-a recent survey suggests that 640 million adults worldwide would like to migrate, principally to North America and Western Europe. 4 This raises serious concerns about the cultural and financial implications, and hence about the political viability, of proposals that would permit sizable inflows. These constraints explain the appeal of Paul Romer's much-discussed proposal to create charter cities-that is, "model" cities featuring economic and social institutions conducive to growth and development that are open to all willing to

Singapore’s Corrupt Practices Investigations Bureau: Guardian of Public Integrity

“…Political scientists and journalists-critics and admirers alike-have tried to classify Singapore's rather unique governance system in variety of ways, with 'benevolent dictatorship', 'authoritarian democracy', 'illiberal democracy', 'guided democracy', 'nanny-state' and 'Singapore Inc' being oft-used labels (e.g. Aoki 2015; Friedman 2011; Haque and Lee 2008;Sagar 2016;Tan 2012). At the same, the rather tight grip on the media landscape through the Media Development Authority (MDA) and Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) may have left more grey area unethical conduct by elites such as cronyism, nepotism, patronage and misuse of information off the public radar.…”

Revisión epistemológica de nuevas tipologías urbanas para la identificación de mini ciudades en América Central

“…Rahul Sagar presentó Are charter cities legitimate? (2016) donde se abre una discusión mencionando que las ciudades chárter tienen más chance de ser exitosas si la comunidad internacional toma el liderazgo en su creación, ya sea induciéndolo o interviniendo, sin embargo el autor comenta que resulta una paradoja ya que entre más dependan de la intervención extranjera, más se acerca, no necesariamente al colonialismo, sino al paternalismo en la forma de un fideicomiso (Sagar, 2016). Esta es una muestra de las discusiones que giran en torno a los intentos de "crear ciudades", lo cual podría ser un punto de partida para evaluar el rol y alcances de las mini ciudades centroamericanas.…”