Are Group Acknowledgements Worth Anything in IEEE 802.15.4 DSME: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract

For data collection scenarios in the Industrial Internet of Things, wireless communication provides a cost-effective and easy-to-deploy alternative to wired networks. The main focus lies on energy efficiency and reliability, as many devices are battery operated. IEEE 802.15.4 DSME enhances reliability by acknowledging each packet individually, imposing an overhead for each transmitted packet, and increasing energy consumption. In networks with little interference, it may be beneficial to aggregate the acknowledgments for multiple nodes and broadcast them in a compressed format to all nodes in the neighborhood. The IEEE 802.15.4 2012 standard describes such a group acknowledgment scheme which, however, disappears in later iterations of the standard. This paper compares different group acknowledgment schemes and proposes a novel group acknowledgment scheme with the goal to examine whether group acknowledgments constitute a viable alternative to regular acknowledgments in reliable data-collection scenarios. Our analysis suggests that apart from a few cases, GACKs do not constitute a valid alternative to the direct acknowledgement of data packets.The goal is to evaluate if GACKs constitute a viable alternative to regular acknowledgments in data collections scenarios with high reliability. In contrast to GACK schemes from the literature [6,11,3], the goal of the proposed GACK schemes is a higher flexibility. For this, retransmissions are conducted through regular GTS and the transmission