2008
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.098822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Laboratories Reporting Serum Quantitative hCG Results Correctly?

Abstract: Background: Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is a heterodimeric glycoprotein hormone that exists in multiple forms. Immunoassays commonly used in clinical laboratories measure intact hCG, total β hCG (intact hCG + hCG free β-subunit), and/or hCG free β-subunit. Measurement of serum concentrations of hCG is useful for confirmation and monitoring of pregnancy, diagnosis of trophoblastic diseases and monitoring of the efficacy of treatment, and prenatal screening. Correctly reporting results for the various for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is consistent with the findings, which indicate that the Siemens Immulite Series (1000 and 2000) report higher values for total hCG as they detect both intact hCG and free βhCG [12]. Furthermore, the Siemens Immulite method has been described to detect all the hCG structural variants [13] and therefore is not surprising that this method had the greatest difference of -14.88% and -9.85% compared with the i-CHROMA™ hCG method. While the Siemens/DPC Immulite method detects all the hCG variants, the Ortho Vitros ECi method does not detect hCGβcf and poorly detects hCGβ and nicked hCG.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This observation is consistent with the findings, which indicate that the Siemens Immulite Series (1000 and 2000) report higher values for total hCG as they detect both intact hCG and free βhCG [12]. Furthermore, the Siemens Immulite method has been described to detect all the hCG structural variants [13] and therefore is not surprising that this method had the greatest difference of -14.88% and -9.85% compared with the i-CHROMA™ hCG method. While the Siemens/DPC Immulite method detects all the hCG variants, the Ortho Vitros ECi method does not detect hCGβcf and poorly detects hCGβ and nicked hCG.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Availability of highly purified IRRs calibrated in substance concentrations (mol) is therefore a major step forward toward improved characterization of hCG assays, which facilitates comparison of results for various forms of hCG and enables calibration of hCG assays in molar units. Universal adoption of the clear and unambiguous IFCC nomenclature (Table 1) is also a critically important prerequisite for improvement (1 ), the adverse consequences of lack of clarity in descriptions of what hCG methods recognize having recently been clearly demonstrated (11 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some question the validity of differences in hCG concentrations, as the recognition of hCG variants [nonnicked and nicked intact hCG (hCG and hCGn), nonnicked and nicked free β-subunit (hCGβ and hCGnβ), and regular and hyperglycosylated (or large) free hCGα] can cause discordance in hCG immunoassay results. Cao and Rej identified the following factors that contribute to the incorrect reporting of hCG results by laboratories: (a) complexity of the hCG molecule and confusion of nomenclature among various forms of hCG; (b) laboratory personnel’s lack of awareness of the distinctions in the forms of hCG and failure to recognize the specificity of assays for measurement of different forms; (c) lack of clarity and uniformity in manufacturers’ reagent labeling; and (d) lack of information on the specificity of each method for the various forms of hCG in most product inserts [153]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%