2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11845-010-0549-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are postoperative drains necessary with the Karydakis flap for treatment of pilonidal sinus? (Can fibrin glue be replaced to drains?) A prospective randomized trial

Abstract: We recommend the use of fibrin sealant with Karydakis flap procedure, but further studies are needed to confirm this conclusion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The failure rate of primary healing was 16%, the length of hospitalization averaged 21.7 days, and the recurrence rate was 16%. Several flap techniques have been described with recurrence rates ranging between zero and 6-8% 6-8,10-13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure rate of primary healing was 16%, the length of hospitalization averaged 21.7 days, and the recurrence rate was 16%. Several flap techniques have been described with recurrence rates ranging between zero and 6-8% 6-8,10-13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main goal of treatment of the sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease is the selection of the most appropriate technique that causes the least number of early postoperative complications, shortens the length of hospital stay, and results in the least number of long-term recurrences [7]. Numerous methods have been described as surgical treatment alternatives for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease, including primary oblique excision and closure, marsupialization, secondary healing, V-Y advancement flap, Z-plasty, Limberg flap, and Karydakis flap techniques [8, 9]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…at riskRR in % (95% CI)Nr. at riskPrimary open (143)2.7* (0.0–5.5)143*5.9* (1.4–10.4)120*NANANANA 32, 114, 118 Primary median closure (2902)0.8 (0.4–1.1)28187.0* (5.7–8.2)1383*18.8* (15.7–21.8)417*NANA 118, 127, 133, 136, 137, 139, 143, 148, 149, 158160, 169, 172174, 183, 192, 199– 201, 232, 242, 243, 246, 247, 597– 603 Primary asymmetric closure (727)1.7 (0.7–2.8)6212.5 (1.1–3.8)4037.4 (4.4–10.4)257NANA 183, 192, 253, 259, 261, 262 Karydakis/Bascom (2471)0.8 (0.4–1.1)23561.7* (1.1–2.4)1343*10.7 (7.4–13.9)257NANA 133, 172, 192, 199, 200, 262, 264, 267, 268, 270, 273, 274, 276, 279, 282, 284, 289– 292, 295, 296, 300, 305– 309, 603 Limberg/Dufourmentel (7653)0.1 (0.0–0.2)73691.1 (0.8–1.4)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%