2016
DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are STEM Syllabi Gendered? A Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis

Abstract: This study explored the gendered nature of STEM higher education institution through a feminist critical discourse analysis of STEM course syllabi from a Midwest research university. I explored STEM syllabi to understand how linguistic features such as stance and interdiscursivity are used in the syllabus and how language and discourses used in the syllabus replicate the masculine nature of STEM education. Findings suggest that the discourses identified in the syllabi reinforce traditional STEM academic roles,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the 4-gram analysis shows Twitter users in women in STEM corpus addressing stereotypes and gender bias against women working in STEM fields by acknowledging its existence and attempting to change it. The use of language to express gender bias is in line with findings that define the nature of STEM work and education to be "gendered" (Parson, 2016). The gendered nature of STEM might hinder women from participation in STEM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Moreover, the 4-gram analysis shows Twitter users in women in STEM corpus addressing stereotypes and gender bias against women working in STEM fields by acknowledging its existence and attempting to change it. The use of language to express gender bias is in line with findings that define the nature of STEM work and education to be "gendered" (Parson, 2016). The gendered nature of STEM might hinder women from participation in STEM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Thus, these perspective are intended to uncover how rural female learners take on as their expected patriarchal beliefs, and manners, with the view to transform their mind-sets in line with gender equality and equity prospects as enshrined the 2013 Constitution Amendment (No. 20) [57][58][59][60]. Hence, it guided in the unpacking of the underpinning concerns, which took shape during personal interviews, and focus group discussions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two examples help visualize how this may be the case. Gaucher et al (2011) and Parson (2016) examined job ads and course syllabi, respectively, and both examined discourse that implicitly reinforced gendered roles and existing power structures. Through experimental design, Gaucher and colleagues found that job ads in men-dominated professions contained more stereotypically masculine words (e.g., active, aggressive, ambitious, decisive) than ads for women-dominated professions.…”
Section: Diversity In Job Advertisementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Giventhewaysthatstructuralbarriersunderscorestudents'interestandpersistence in engineering based on gender and racial identities, it is important to understand the variouscuesthatundergraduatestudentsreceiverelatedtoengineeringfieldsandcareers. Discourse in formal contexts serves to signal and perpetuate gendered power structures,deterringwomen'sbelongingness (Gaucheretal.,2011)orfavoringtraditionally masculine roles and stereotypes (Parson, 2016). Slaton (2010) also revealed how U.S. engineering education has been historically steeped in whiteness, drawing attentiontohowcelebratorydiscourseaboutdiversity"mayforecloseinquiryintothe racializedfunctionsofconventionalgatekeepingtoolssuchasstandardsoftalentand eligibility"(p.17).Inthepresentstudy,weexplorehowinequityandpowerpervadediscoursesandlinguistictoolswithinengineeringinternshipadvertisements-animportant undertaking,asinternshipsoftenserveasstudents'firstopportunitytogainprofessional † While"StudentsofColor,""Black,Indigenous,andPeopleofColor(BIPOC),"and"raciallyminoritized"arecommonphrasesforrace/ethnicityineducationalresearch,wealsoacknowledgethelimitationsofthisphrasing.Racial andethnicgroupshavevastlydifferentrealitiesandusingsuchterminologyseparatelyfromgendermayindicate"an entrenched misunderstanding of how women's experiences as women also intersect with their experiences as members ofethnicminoritygroups,aswellasotherhistoricallyoppressedsocialgroups" (Bowleg,2008,p.313).Thus,while terminologyappearsasdistinct,itisalsonecessarytocenterWomenofColorinanydiscussionaboutgenderedand racialized discourse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%