2022
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2022.148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are We Building Our Science on Quicksand? Current Reproducibility Practices in Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a study can, of course, shed light on things like transcription errors, but its primary benefit comes from shedding light on hidden choices made by the original authors. For example, Herndon, Ash, and Pollin (2014) set out to conduct a literal reproducibility study of the Reinhart and Rogoff (2010) examination of the effects of national debt ratios on economic growth (see Cortina et al, 2022, for a more detailed description of both papers). It was only after they were unable to reproduce the original results that they discovered errors, both intentional and unintentional, in the handling and analysis of data by the original authors.…”
Section: Methodological Moderators: Different Forms Of Reproducibilit...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Such a study can, of course, shed light on things like transcription errors, but its primary benefit comes from shedding light on hidden choices made by the original authors. For example, Herndon, Ash, and Pollin (2014) set out to conduct a literal reproducibility study of the Reinhart and Rogoff (2010) examination of the effects of national debt ratios on economic growth (see Cortina et al, 2022, for a more detailed description of both papers). It was only after they were unable to reproduce the original results that they discovered errors, both intentional and unintentional, in the handling and analysis of data by the original authors.…”
Section: Methodological Moderators: Different Forms Of Reproducibilit...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, our first priority for this editorial is to provide clear definitions of the three types of study. In so doing, we draw heavily on our prior work in this space (e.g., Köhler & Cortina, 2021; Cortina, Köhler, & Craig, 2022), which also constitutes the foundations on which the JOMSR Editors based their respective definitions (Kraimer, 2023; Kraimer et al, 2023).…”
Section: Defining and Distinguishing Replication Reproducibility And ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reproducibility refers to reanalyzing a dataset, whereas replication refers to the reexamination of relationships through the use of a different dataset (Köhler & Cortina, 2021). Literal reproducibility (Cortina et al, 2023) and literal replication (Köhler & Cortina, 2021) refer to studies where researchers attempt to follow the research procedures of the target study as closely as possible. Constructive reproducibility (Cortina et al, 2023) and constructive replication (Köhler & Cortina, 2021) refer to studies in which researchers follow some procedures from the target study, but make strategic modifications to more robustly test a phenomenon or strengthen insights derived from the research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%