2007
DOI: 10.1097/psy.0b013e31814c405c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Area Under the Curve and Other Summary Indicators of Repeated Waking Cortisol Measurements

Abstract: Principal components analyses revealed that summary parameters derived from repeated cortisol measurements can be grouped into two meaningful general categories: measures of the magnitude of response and measures of the pattern of response over time.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
331
1
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 412 publications
(339 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
331
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For reducing the number of statistical comparisons between PARL and AMS, cardiac response parameters were calculated as area under the curve (AUC), which represents both the magnitude of the response and the changes occurring over time (Fekedulegn et al, 2007). Areas under the response curves were determined for each individual in the PREMILK and MILK periods utilising a trapezoid method described by Lay et al (1996) as follows:…”
Section: Avoidance Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For reducing the number of statistical comparisons between PARL and AMS, cardiac response parameters were calculated as area under the curve (AUC), which represents both the magnitude of the response and the changes occurring over time (Fekedulegn et al, 2007). Areas under the response curves were determined for each individual in the PREMILK and MILK periods utilising a trapezoid method described by Lay et al (1996) as follows:…”
Section: Avoidance Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AUCg measures, in endocrinological terms, the total 'hormonal output', whereas the AUCi measures the hormonal changes over time. Therefore, the latter index is especially suitable to evaluate HPA-axis sensitivity (Fekedulegn et al, 2007). In a first step, the effects of HF-rTMS on the HPA-axis were analyzed using the real and sham AUC values as dependent variables in a repeated measures ANOVA analysis with stimulation (real HF-rTMS-sham HF-rTMS) as the within subjects factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one of the strongest studies in terms of methodology (Champaneri et al, 2013), which conducted multi-point diurnal saliva sampling across three days in a large sample of men and women, evidences this negative relationship between obesity and CAR. Finally, considering that all but one reviewed study (Ursache et al, 2012), measured CAR as the difference between waking cortisol and thirty minutes postwaking, we recommend that future research incorporate smaller time intervals (e.g., 15 min), especially given that different trends at the 15-min interval level can have a marked impact on the resulting CAR calculation (Fekedulegn et al 2007). This improvement in CAR measurement precision is an important step in clarifying the relationships between each type of obesity and CAR.…”
Section: Cortisol Awakening Response (Car)mentioning
confidence: 99%