2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1759(01)00571-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Area under the curve calculations as a tool to compare the efficacy of equine influenza vaccines—a retrospective analysis of three independent field trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To compare baseline IFN-γ ELISpot responses between G1-6 a 1-way ANOVA was used with Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison test. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis can be used in immunological studies as a tool to estimate overall vaccine immunogenicity and durability ( Heldens et al, 2002 ). AUC values for identical time periods post-vaccination were calculated per individual for each time point.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare baseline IFN-γ ELISpot responses between G1-6 a 1-way ANOVA was used with Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison test. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis can be used in immunological studies as a tool to estimate overall vaccine immunogenicity and durability ( Heldens et al, 2002 ). AUC values for identical time periods post-vaccination were calculated per individual for each time point.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other features of the viral titer curve, besides peak viral load or some measure of infection duration, are sometimes used to assess the effectiveness of antiviral treatment (Beggs and Dobrovolny, 2015 ). These include the area under the viral titer curve (AUC) (Ryan et al, 1994 ; Hayden et al, 1999 ; Heldens and van den Hoven, 2002 ; Rayner et al, 2013 ; Beggs and Dobrovolny, 2015 ) or the viral growth and decay rates (Beggs and Dobrovolny, 2015 ). Measurement of these features might allow further differentiation of the role of antiviral mechanism of action in combination therapy, although the value of these measures in terms of clinical benefit to the patient are unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pairwise comparisons were then carried out using Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) correction for multiple testing. The area under the curve (AUC) as described by Heldens et al [23] was also calculated by the trapezoidal rule and ANOVA and pairwise comparisons using Tukey's HSD were carried out. All results are presented as mean and standard error of the mean.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%