2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10896-014-9605-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arresting Women: Pro-arrest Policies, Debates, and Developments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concern that the passage of mandatory arrest laws has resulted in an increase in dual arrest rates (see, for example, Martin, 1997; Miller, 2001; Zorza & Woods, 1994) led to the passage of primary aggressor laws enacted to discourage dual arrests by mandating that the responding officers endeavor to determine the primary aggressor. Research has generally indicated that these laws have effected lower dual arrest rates (see, for example, Dichter et al, 2011; Fraehlich & Ursel, 2014; Hirschel & Deveau, 2017), though not necessarily at a statistically significant level (Hirschel et al, 2020).…”
Section: Prior Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concern that the passage of mandatory arrest laws has resulted in an increase in dual arrest rates (see, for example, Martin, 1997; Miller, 2001; Zorza & Woods, 1994) led to the passage of primary aggressor laws enacted to discourage dual arrests by mandating that the responding officers endeavor to determine the primary aggressor. Research has generally indicated that these laws have effected lower dual arrest rates (see, for example, Dichter et al, 2011; Fraehlich & Ursel, 2014; Hirschel & Deveau, 2017), though not necessarily at a statistically significant level (Hirschel et al, 2020).…”
Section: Prior Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, in a national study of 2003 data, Dichter, Marcus, Morabito, and Rhodes (2011) found that dual arrests were slightly less likely to be made in jurisdictions with primary aggressor policies. Fraehlich and Ursel (2014) reported that the implementation of a primary aggressor policy resulted in a decline of the dual arrest rate in Winnipeg, Canada, from 9% in 1999-2000 to 3% in 2004-2005. In a study of 282 agencies in five states, Hirschel et al (2007) reported that agencies operating with primary aggressor laws and/or policies had a dual arrest rate of 2%, less than a quarter of the 9% dual arrest rate found in jurisdictions without a primary aggressor law or policy (Chapter 8).…”
Section: Prior Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that perpetrators are often intoxicated during the commission of domestic violence (Leonard & Quigley, 1999; O’Brien et al, 2016; Thompson & Kingree, 2006) and that perpetrators of domestic violence are more likely to be arrested if intoxicated (Feder, 1997; Jones & Belknap, 1999). This relationship holds for arrested women and dual arrests (Fraehlich & Ursel, 2014; Houry, Reddy, & Parramore, 2006; Martin, 1997; Roark, 2016). Further complicating the dynamics is that victims, too, may use substances as a coping strategy (Anderson, 2002; Dutton et al, 2006; Logan, Walker, Cole, & Leukefeld, 2002; O’Brien et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%