2008
DOI: 10.1016/s0828-282x(08)70681-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arrhythmia device lead extraction: Factors that necessitate laser assistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although others 4,12 have identified defibrillator leads to be predictors of failed simple extraction, when we included defibrillator versus pacemaker lead type in our model, it did not reach statistical significance. The presence of a system infection has faired out as a predictor of simple extraction in certain adult patient series 5,12,13 ; however, in the present study, it did not reach statistical significance on multivariable analysis. It is important to note that system infection was rare (8%) in our series compared with being the predominant indication for lead extraction in most series on older adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although others 4,12 have identified defibrillator leads to be predictors of failed simple extraction, when we included defibrillator versus pacemaker lead type in our model, it did not reach statistical significance. The presence of a system infection has faired out as a predictor of simple extraction in certain adult patient series 5,12,13 ; however, in the present study, it did not reach statistical significance on multivariable analysis. It is important to note that system infection was rare (8%) in our series compared with being the predominant indication for lead extraction in most series on older adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In our center's experience, successful lead extraction was achieved in about one third of patients, using simple traction with a nonlocking stylet, an outcome similar to that reported in several large series on older adult patients with simple extraction success rates ranging from 16.4% to 31.2%. [1][2][3][4][5]7,12 Of the leads undergoing a complex extraction in our study, about three quarters required the use of an RF-powered sheath, which was successful in more than half, for a cumulative success rate of 94%. There are no reports on the use of RF-powered sheaths in pediatric or adult CHD patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The minor complications seen in this cohort were not associated with the lead extraction itself; rather, they are risks associated with any cardiac rhythm device implant. As is the case with extraction of other leads (14,18,19), we found that lead implant duration, younger patient age, and the absence of infection were associated with a significant increase in the need for CTS assistance, thereby increasing the complexity of the extraction procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%