Ictis 2011 2011
DOI: 10.1061/41177(415)48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arterial Performance Measurement System with Wireless Magnetic Sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the inner product of expanded basis h x ð Þ, h x i ð Þ h i is further defined by the kernel function K x, x i ð Þ. Two popular choices for the K function are implemented in this research, the polynomial kernel function by Equation (17) and the Gaussian kernel function by Equation (18).…”
Section: Nonlinear Support Vector Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where the inner product of expanded basis h x ð Þ, h x i ð Þ h i is further defined by the kernel function K x, x i ð Þ. Two popular choices for the K function are implemented in this research, the polynomial kernel function by Equation (17) and the Gaussian kernel function by Equation (18).…”
Section: Nonlinear Support Vector Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some research has used unique vehicle IDs for identification. Examples include matching unique Bluetooth MAC addresses ( 7 13 ), GPS device addresses ( 14 ), and magnetic signatures ( 15 18 ). However, not all these ID matching facilities are widely deployed in the U.S. Another approach is vehicle trajectory tracking.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest "signature" used for vehicle matching is an estimate of the vehicle's length [15]. Other studies have matched vehicles with richer data sets [16], [17] similar to those used in this study. These algorithms can be readily used in highway or free flow situations, but acceleration due to intersections or congestion causes distortion in signatures which decreases the percentage of correct matches [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, new systems for travel time estimation have emerged which may overcome the limitations of loop detectors. Examples include GPS‐equipped probe vehicles (Hofleitner et al., ), toll tag matching (Turner et al., ), license plate re‐identification (Bertini et al., ; Xu et al., ), cellphone location services (Qiu et al., ), vehicle optical image identification (Kuroiwa et al., ), vehicle magnetic signature matching (Kwong et al., ; Kavaler et al., ; Sanchez et al., , b; Charbonnier et al., ), and Bluetooth MAC address matching (Barcelo et al., ; Brennan et al., ; Haghani et al., ; Quayle et al., ; Hainen et al., ; Richardson et al., ; Bakula et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%