Artificial Insemination in Farm Animals 2011
DOI: 10.5772/17943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Insemination: Current and Future Trends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Artificial insemination technicians can also influence fertility rates (STEYN, 2003;PALACÍN et al, 2012;FRANCISCO, 2018) since some individuals perform more efficiently than others (PALACÍN et al, 2012). Differences among these workers may result from variations in the time spent in each insemination (WINDSOR, 1995), their ability to navigate cervix folds (EPPLESTON, MAXWELL, 1993;SANTOLARIA et al, 2011;FRANCISCO, 2018) without forcing the passage of the guns used (SANTOLARIA et al, 2011;VALENTIM et al, 2016;FRANCISCO, 2018), the depth at which they deposit semen in the cervical canal (SALVADOR et al, 2005;CANDAPPA, BARTLEWSKI, 2011;FRANCISCO, 2018), the speed at which they deposit it (too fast would increase cervical reflux) (CANDAPPA, BARTLEWSKI, 2011;MORRELL, 2011), among others. In Francisco (2018), the inseminating team's experience conditioned fertility rates.…”
Section: Fertility Rates After Artificial Inseminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Artificial insemination technicians can also influence fertility rates (STEYN, 2003;PALACÍN et al, 2012;FRANCISCO, 2018) since some individuals perform more efficiently than others (PALACÍN et al, 2012). Differences among these workers may result from variations in the time spent in each insemination (WINDSOR, 1995), their ability to navigate cervix folds (EPPLESTON, MAXWELL, 1993;SANTOLARIA et al, 2011;FRANCISCO, 2018) without forcing the passage of the guns used (SANTOLARIA et al, 2011;VALENTIM et al, 2016;FRANCISCO, 2018), the depth at which they deposit semen in the cervical canal (SALVADOR et al, 2005;CANDAPPA, BARTLEWSKI, 2011;FRANCISCO, 2018), the speed at which they deposit it (too fast would increase cervical reflux) (CANDAPPA, BARTLEWSKI, 2011;MORRELL, 2011), among others. In Francisco (2018), the inseminating team's experience conditioned fertility rates.…”
Section: Fertility Rates After Artificial Inseminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple factors affect the fertility rates of small ruminants after artificial insemination (AI): genetics, individual characteristics, feeding, season, environment, reproductive activity control, semen collection and conservation, female management, cervix morphology, volume, insertion into the female genital tract, and semen deposition site (MORRELL, 2011;ARREBOLA et al, 2013). AI success depends on its instruments since they can condition artificial insemination technicians' work; namely, location, fixation, and insertion of the gun in the cervical canal (QUINTAS et al, 2021;SILVA, 2022) and stress due to handling (PALACIOS, 2010;LEO, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique was developed originally to reduce disease transmission since it allows animals to be bred without coming into contact with each other or being transported to different farms for mating [6]. Additional benefits include safety and allowing access to more males, thus permitting more rapid genetic improvement than is possible with natural mating [7]. Success with the technique is dependent on a number of factors, especially a readily available supply of good quality semen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common use of spermatozoa in assisted reproduction is expanding especially for freezing or FIV, leading to a steady strengthened interest intrigued with the distinguishing sub-fertile or infertile males [1][2][3][4][5]. The evaluation of the male fertility potential is based on the analysis of basic sperm characteristics motility and morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%