Artificial Intelligence Applications in Agricultural Machinery Manufacturing

Aldağ, Mustafa Cem; Eker, Bülent

doi:10.17366/uhmfd.2018.3.2

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Leveraging technology, Quality 4.0 not only aids managers in ongoing process control but also expedites reporting tasks and enhances process transparency, thereby fostering organizational learning and continuous improvement (Emblemsvåg, 2020). This interpretation of Quality 4.0 was presented by, among others, by Aldag and Eker (2018), Allcock (2018) and Jacob, 2020.…”

Section: Literature and Theoretical Approachmentioning

confidence: 54%

Insights into quality professionals' adoption of Quality 4.0 in the high-tech industry

Rogala,

Brzozowski,

Pankowska

2024

TQM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis paper examines the factors influencing the adoption of Quality 4.0 technologies by quality professionals. The study evaluates perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude towards use, and intention to use new technologies.Design/methodology/approachThe research involves a literature review, identification of latent variables derived from the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and a survey conducted among 200 quality professionals in the high-tech sector using computer-assisted web interviews.FindingsThe study elucidates the attitudes and intentions of high-tech industry employees towards adopting Quality 4.0 technologies. The primary conclusion drawn is that the predominant factor shaping the attitude of quality professionals towards new technologies is their confidence in their ability to effectively engage with these technologies rather than solely the perceived usefulness of such technologies to themselves or their organization.Research limitations/implicationsThis study is subject to certain limitations. Firstly, it focuses on five variables identified in the TAM model, potentially overlooking other pertinent factors that could provide a more comprehensive understanding. Secondly, the analysis of Quality 4.0 technologies is presented in a generalized manner, possibly resulting in nuanced differences if each specific technology were examined individually.Originality/valueThis article fills a gap in the literature by identifying the factors influencing quality professionals' adoption of Quality 4.0 technologies and delineating the relationships between these factors.

show abstract

Section: Literature and Theoretical Approachmentioning

confidence: 54%