Artificial Intelligence in Cervical Cancer Screening: Opportunities and Challenges

Abstract

Among gynecological pathologies, cervical cancer has always represented a health problem with great social impact. The giant strides made as a result of both the screening programs perfected and implemented over the years and the use of new and accurate technological equipment have in fact significantly improved our clinical approach in the management and personalized diagnosis of precancerous lesions of the cervix. In this context, the advent of artificial intelligence and digital algorithms could represent new directions available to gynecologists and pathologists for the following: (i) the standardization of screening procedures, (ii) the identification of increasingly early lesions, and (iii) heightening the diagnostic accuracy of targeted biopsies and prognostic analysis of cervical cancer. The purpose of our review was to evaluate to what extent artificial intelligence can be integrated into current protocols, to identify the strengths and/or weaknesses of this method, and, above all, determine what we should expect in the future to develop increasingly safer solutions, as well as increasingly targeted and personalized screening programs for these patients. Furthermore, in an innovative way, and through a multidisciplinary vision (gynecologists, pathologists, and computer scientists), with this manuscript, we highlight a key role that AI could have in the management of HPV-positive patients. In our vision, AI will move from being a simple diagnostic device to being used as a tool for performing risk analyses of HPV-related disease progression. This is thanks to the ability of new software not only to analyze clinical and histopathological images but also to evaluate and integrate clinical elements such as vaccines, the composition of the microbiota, and the immune status of patients. In fact, the single-factor evaluation of high-risk HPV strains represents a limitation that must be overcome. Therefore, AI, through multifactorial analysis, will be able to generate a risk score that will better stratify patients and will support clinicians in choosing highly personalized treatments overall. Our study remains an innovative proposal and idea, as the literature to date presents a limitation in that this topic is considered niche, but we believe that the union of common efforts can overcome this limitation.