2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

As Low Dose as Sufficient Quality: Optimization of Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Scanning Protocol for Tooth Autotransplantation Planning and Follow-up in Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, for the diagnosis of zygomaticomaxillary fractures, the dose reduction through LD‐CBCT did not decrease diagnostic reliability (Rozema et al, ). Moreover, LD‐CBCT image quality was considered sufficient for various orthodontic diagnostics (Brown, Scarfe, Scheetz, Silveira, & Farman, ; Cook, Timock, Crowe, Wang, & Covell, ; Hidalgo Rivas, Horner, Thiruvenkatachari, Davies, & Theodorakou, ; Ludlow & Walker, ; Portelli et al, ), for tooth autotransplantation planning (EzEldeen et al, ), and for preimplant radiographic assessment (Liljeholm et al, ). Although no dedicated LD‐CBCT protocols have yet been tested, there is evidence from the field of endodontics and periodontology demonstrating acceptable image quality with reduced kV, mA, and exposure time (Al‐Okshi, Theodorakou, & Lindh, ; Jones, Mannocci, Andiappan, Brown, & Patel, ; Lagos de Melo et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, for the diagnosis of zygomaticomaxillary fractures, the dose reduction through LD‐CBCT did not decrease diagnostic reliability (Rozema et al, ). Moreover, LD‐CBCT image quality was considered sufficient for various orthodontic diagnostics (Brown, Scarfe, Scheetz, Silveira, & Farman, ; Cook, Timock, Crowe, Wang, & Covell, ; Hidalgo Rivas, Horner, Thiruvenkatachari, Davies, & Theodorakou, ; Ludlow & Walker, ; Portelli et al, ), for tooth autotransplantation planning (EzEldeen et al, ), and for preimplant radiographic assessment (Liljeholm et al, ). Although no dedicated LD‐CBCT protocols have yet been tested, there is evidence from the field of endodontics and periodontology demonstrating acceptable image quality with reduced kV, mA, and exposure time (Al‐Okshi, Theodorakou, & Lindh, ; Jones, Mannocci, Andiappan, Brown, & Patel, ; Lagos de Melo et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For observer 2, misreadings of approximately 1.3 mm were recorded. Most likely, these outliers are attributed to individual measurement errors (EzEldeen et al, 2017), and for preimplant radiographic assessment (Liljeholm et al, 2017). Although no dedicated LD-CBCT protocols have yet been tested, there is evidence from the field of endodontics and periodontology demonstrating acceptable image quality with reduced kV, mA, and exposure time (Al-Okshi, Theodorakou, & Lindh, 2017;Jones, Mannocci, Andiappan, Brown, & Patel, 2015;Lagos de Melo et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restriction of the Field of view (FOV) to the region of interest seems to be the most efficient strategy for dose reduction, appearing as a relevant source of optimization 14,18 . For this DIMITRA task, the field of 8 × 8 cm was chosen, given that it is a relatively small FOV and is capable of including both jaws of a child in a single scan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, voxels phantoms of male children were chosen considering that MC calculations demands plenty computational time and workflow. Male/female MC simulations were subject of previous studies of our group 5,18 and it was already demonstrated that doses were slightly lower in males than females. Despite this slight disparity, difference in organ doses (+/−5%) could be considered within the statistical uncertainty of the MC dose calculation 5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of 3D printing in dentistry goes through three stages, starting with data acquisition using low dose cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) [18,19] and/or intraoral scanner (IOS) [20,21], followed by processing and designing using dedicated software tools, and, finally, printing [12,22,23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%