2015
DOI: 10.1002/0471142727.mb2806s111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assaying Cell Cycle Status Using Flow Cytometry

Abstract: In this unit, we describe two protocols for analyzing cell cycle status using flow cytometry. The first is based on the simultaneous analysis of proliferation specific marker (Ki-67) and cellular DNA content, which discriminates resting/quiescent cell populations (G0 cell) and quantifies cell cycle distribution (G1, S or G2/M, respectively). The second is based on differential staining of DNA and RNA through co-staining of Hoechst 33342 and Pyronin Y, which is also useful to identify G0 cells from G1 cells. Al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
171
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
171
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before investigating the relationship between cell cycle status and editing efficiency, we first explored the cell cycle progression of CD34+ cells in ex vivo culture using immunophenotyping combined with Hoechst 33342 (stains for DNA) and Ki67 (highly expressed in proliferating cells) staining. (Gerdes et al, 1984;Kim and Sederstrom, 2015). We found that more than 50% of cryopreserved mPB CD34+ HSPCs are quiescent (in G0) when thawed, but they gradually enter the cell cycle and are fully cycling by 3 days in SC culture (Figures 2A,2B, and S2).…”
Section: Establishing the Timing Of Cell Cycle Status In Cd34+ Subsetmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Before investigating the relationship between cell cycle status and editing efficiency, we first explored the cell cycle progression of CD34+ cells in ex vivo culture using immunophenotyping combined with Hoechst 33342 (stains for DNA) and Ki67 (highly expressed in proliferating cells) staining. (Gerdes et al, 1984;Kim and Sederstrom, 2015). We found that more than 50% of cryopreserved mPB CD34+ HSPCs are quiescent (in G0) when thawed, but they gradually enter the cell cycle and are fully cycling by 3 days in SC culture (Figures 2A,2B, and S2).…”
Section: Establishing the Timing Of Cell Cycle Status In Cd34+ Subsetmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Isolated CD4+ T cells were co-cultured at a 1:5 ratio with bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) for 3 days in the presence or absence of C. muridarum AR Nigg (5μg/mL). Expression of CD69 and Ki67 was determined by FACS surface and nuclear staining respectively, as described previously (36). Supernatants from dendritic-cell stimulated CD4+ T cells were collected and IL-2 concentrations determined by ELISA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 3A-C, leukemia cells co-cultured with primary meningeal cells are less proliferative as shown by decreased Ki-67 staining, significantly decreased S phase, and increased G0/G1 phase. We next used Hoechst-Pyronin Y staining to better distinguish between G0 and G1 phases 29 . As shown in Figure 3D-F, leukemia cells in co-culture with primary meningeal cells exhibited increased G0 phase, indicative of quiescence, relative to leukemia cells in suspension.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell cycle and proliferation were assessed using a Click-iT Plus EdU flow cytometry kit (ThermoFisher). To differentiate G0 from G1 phases of the cell cycle, leukemia cells were stained with both Hoechst 33342 (Sigma-Aldrich) and pyronin Y (Sigma-Aldrich) and analyzed by flow cytometry 29 . To assess long-term quiescence in vivo , immediately prior to transplantation leukemia cells were labeled with the membrane dye DiR (1,1’-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3’,3’-Tetramethylindotricarbocyanine Iodide; ThermoFisher) for microscopy or DiD (1,1’-dioctadecyl-3,3,3’,3’-tetramethylindodicarbocyanine, 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate salt; ThermoFisher) for flow cytometry 28,3033 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%