Assemblage and social movements: Tibet Support Groups and the spatialities of political organisation

Abstract

This paper engages in debates about the spatiality of social movements which have argued that examining politics purely through territorial or relational understandings of space does not adequately grasp the ways in which social movements undertake their activities. The paper argues that a possible route through this debate lies in the concept of assemblage, which has recently been deployed in geography in order to understand the emergence and practice of social organisation and activity. The paper develops these ideas through an empirical discussion of the practices that help to maintain a particular social movement organisation -a Tibet Support Group (TSG). Through ethnographic engagement with a particular TSG, the paper argues that through the quotidian activities like delivering the mail we can understand how sociospatial practices within an organisation display both territorial and relational elements at the same time. This develops an account that advances knowledge of the spatiality of political action, and with it the ability of assemblage to understand organisational practices, but also develops theoretical insights into TSGs as a particular type of organisation.key words social movements assemblage ethnography Tibet space politics

Mobilizing drug policy activism: conferences, convergence spaces and ephemeral fixtures in social movement mobilization

“…As discussed above, there are numerous examinations of the role of conferences, mass demonstrations and mega events as occurrences that work to catalyse social movements (Davies, 2012;Della Porta and Andretta, 2002;Diani, 2000;Routledge, 2003Routledge, , 2009Wainwright, Prudham, & Glassman, 2000). While much of this work interestingly engages the ways that these events function temporally within the history of a social movement, it is only recently that they have begun to be spatially conceptualized.…”

“…"Place, space, territory, region, scale and networks", Miller (2013, p. 285) notes, "have each been placed front and centre by a variety of social movement scholars and each spatiality-specific approach has yielded valuable insights, yet there has been little progress toward a more integrative approach". Drawing on Jessop et al's (2008) theorizations of sociospatial relations, Miller (2013) and others have worked to move beyond the typological and nested scalar hierarchies that much of this work produces to extrapolate the co-scalar production of social movements and advocacy networks (Davies, 2012;Leitner, Sheppard, & Sziarto, 2008;Nicholls, 2009;Nicholls, Miller, & Beaumont, 2013).…”

Movimiento social como actor - red: Ensamblando el comité por la defensa del Agua y del Páramo de Santurbán

“…El uso de la red jurídica, en asocio con otros recursos como las marchas, la producción de videos, las denuncias en redes sociales, la movilización de información en redes amigas, se ensamblan para que el Comité pueda agenciar, no solo su lucha, sino instalar en el debate público el derecho de las comunidades a defender el agua y exigir del Estado un mayor control a las actividades extractivas (Zagallo, 2015). Así, la agencia social se encuentra, entonces, distribuida a través del ensamblaje (Davies, 2012). Cada marcha fue la expresión y el resultado de las diferentes conexiones, y otras redes que se iban sumando al movimiento.…”

“…Se refiere, entonces, a la compleja red de actantes, entidades, intereses, objetos, diferentes seres humanos y/o materiales que están relacionados e involucrados en y para la acción social (Latour, 1999(Latour, , 2005Rodríguez-Giralt, 2011). Propone Rodríguez-Giralt que en lugar de ver el "movimiento social" como un "centro de cálculo" (Latour, 1992), que coordina y gestiona una serie de organizaciones en red, los recursos y materiales, sería mejor conceptualizarla como una serie de operadores (tanto humanos como no humanos) 5 Con ensamblaje nos referirnos al carácter espacial-temporal, heterogéneo y contingente en la formación de un movimiento social (Davies, 2012). Es un modo de ordenar entidades heterogéneas que están asociadas y trabajan juntas en un determinado momento (Müller, 2015).…”

Constructing legitimacy without legality in long term exile: Comparing Western Sahara and Tibet

“…Although two of the three UN General Assembly Resolutions on Tibet (1961 and1965) referred to the principle of self-determination, their focus was primarily on human rights violations, and the Tibetan case remains in a state of limbo at the UN (Shakya, 1999;Walt van Praag, 1987). However despite this lack of international legal support, TGiE has been remarkably successful in garnering international popular support, based around what is now an extensive Tibet freedom movement (Davies, 2012). 9 A key element to exiled Tibetans' claims to legitimacy on the international stage has been the leadership's avowal of non-violence as a political strategy.…”