2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-016-3746-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing colonic anatomy normal values based on air contrast enemas in children younger than 6 years

Abstract: BackgroundContrast enemas with barium or water-soluble contrast agents are sometimes performed in children with severe intractable constipation to identify anatomical abnormalities. However there are no clear definitions for normal colonic size or abnormalities such as colonic dilation or sigmoid redundancy in children.ObjectiveTo describe characteristics of colonic anatomy on air contrast enemas in children without constipation to provide normal values for colonic size ratios in children.Materials and methods… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
2
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
18
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Bolia and Kumar commented that we found no differences in the diameters of the segmental colon between patients with constipation and the "reference" group. Although contrary to the data reported in the literature, data emerged from the comparison between our patients and those taken as reference and reported in the literature [2]. We do not know if the reason is due to the fact that children < 6 years had experienced a pneumatic reduction of intussusception.…”
Section: To the Editorscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bolia and Kumar commented that we found no differences in the diameters of the segmental colon between patients with constipation and the "reference" group. Although contrary to the data reported in the literature, data emerged from the comparison between our patients and those taken as reference and reported in the literature [2]. We do not know if the reason is due to the fact that children < 6 years had experienced a pneumatic reduction of intussusception.…”
Section: To the Editorscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Why we conclude that a ratio (rectosigmoid length/L2) > 15 is clinically significant? We used a ratio to eliminate the age factor as much as possible and to compare it to the Koppen and Al values [2]. We have identified a value of ratio > 15 because, in all our cases of refractory constipation, the values were greater than 15.…”
Section: To the Editorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the different colonic segments, we compared colonic diameter and length, shown as SCS ratios, with data from a normative pediatric population of children <6 years of age (Table 4, original data are provided in the Data S1). 21 The SCS ratios for the length of the rectosigmoid and the descending colon were significantly larger in children with FC compared to the normative population (P<.0001 for both). In the sigmoid colon, the SCS ratio for colonic diameter was significantly larger in children with FC (P<.0007), but there was no significant difference between the SCS for the diameter of the rectum and the descending colon between the two groups.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Colonic Segment Size Characteristics Between mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Moreover, this technique does not require calibration with an external tool. This method has been described in another recent publication by our group, where we determined normative colon size characteristics in 119 children <6 years of age who underwent pneumatic reduction of intussusceptions . The data from this publication were used to compare the data from our current study with a normative population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation