Driving Assessment 2005 : Proceedings of the 3rd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Trainin 2005
DOI: 10.17077/drivingassessment.1140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Driving Performance with Moderate Visual Field Loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CDRS was blind to participants' group status (ie, MCI or normal control). Although the present study used only 1 driving evaluator, previous research using the same route and evaluation tool has reported acceptable interrater reliability for global ratings (weighted coefficient ¼ .72) using 2 raters, 29 one of whom conducted all the evaluations in this study. The drive was performed along a predetermined route that included (a) 2-and 4-lane roads with and without median strips and barriers, (b) highways and interstates, (c) intersections with and without traffic lights, and (d) stop and yield signs.…”
Section: On-road Driving Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CDRS was blind to participants' group status (ie, MCI or normal control). Although the present study used only 1 driving evaluator, previous research using the same route and evaluation tool has reported acceptable interrater reliability for global ratings (weighted coefficient ¼ .72) using 2 raters, 29 one of whom conducted all the evaluations in this study. The drive was performed along a predetermined route that included (a) 2-and 4-lane roads with and without median strips and barriers, (b) highways and interstates, (c) intersections with and without traffic lights, and (d) stop and yield signs.…”
Section: On-road Driving Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The driving skills of each licensed and currently driving participant were assessed in collaboration with the UAB Driving Assessment Clinic, using a standardized route and rating tool developed for research studies. 29 This assessment was performed during the study visit under clear weather conditions. Under rainy or inclement weather conditions the evaluation was postponed and conducted in fair weather within 2 weeks of the study visit.…”
Section: On-road Driving Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%