Assessing external factors on substitution of fossil fuel by biofuels: model perspective from the Nordic region

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a theoretical model by which to demonstrate how taxes and subsidies work as external factors to substitute fossil fuel by a forest-based biofuel. For biofuels, this study predominantly considers solid-form biomass that generates electricity; for fossil fuels, it considers coal. The model results explicated with three states by using various numeric values taken from the literature. Three states are as follows: a situation without a tax and subsidy, a situation with a biofuel subsidy, and a situation with a biofuel subsidy and a fossil fuel tax. The results of the first state exemplify current fuel market situation; those of the second indicate that the aggregate demand for biofuel has shifted upwards by around 15 % and that substitution has increased by around 18 % due to biofuel subsidies being offered. Under the third state, aggregate biofuel demand has shifted upwards by around 19 %, reduced the demand for fossil fuels by around 13 %, and increased substitution by around 31 %. This state relates to a greater sense of social welfare than other two states. It is conceivable that the joint application of taxes and subsidies will succour biofuel to supplant fossil fuel in the near future.

Inter-disciplinary analysis for synthesising weevil damage and stakeholder perception related to stump harvesting

“…In addition, stump-excavation costs can be minimised via revenues from stump harvesting (Walmsley and Godbold 2009). This could be supported by tax revenues and subsidies meant to support the replacement of fossil fuels with the wood-based biofuel sector (Khanam et al 2016), in which cost is a significant factor (Adams et al 2011).…”