2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing social vulnerability to earthquake disaster using rough analytic hierarchy process method: A case study of Hanzhong City, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, local authorities believe that the RSS restores key ecosystem services in these areas, alleviates poverty, improves the livelihoods of rural households, and promotes rapid economic growth and urbanization. More detailed information on this specific program is available in a series of studies by Guo and Kapucu [ 2 , 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, local authorities believe that the RSS restores key ecosystem services in these areas, alleviates poverty, improves the livelihoods of rural households, and promotes rapid economic growth and urbanization. More detailed information on this specific program is available in a series of studies by Guo and Kapucu [ 2 , 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in some parts of China, residents may perceive different probability levels associated with disaster-related risks and their potential consequences, and may have different levels of self-confidence about how to protect themselves from loss. Residents mainly resort to shangfang (petitioning high-level government authorities to appeal perceived unfair actions), jingzuo (sit-ins on the doorsteps of government buildings or on highways and railways to obstruct transportation), demonstrations, parades, or propagandizing their appeals by refusing to be resettled [ 2 , 3 , 4 ]. These problems continue to challenge a comprehensive understanding of disaster resettlement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have developed methods for earthquake vulnerability assessment with various criteria and indicators. Some of them using pairwise comparison and AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) [6], Rough AHP [2], the combination of AHP and VIKOR (VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) [1], complex vulnerability index using SMCE (Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation) [9], and development of vulnerability indicators using catastrophe progression assessment [4]. However, the spatial resolution of also different, most of them in the urban-district scale, but one of them has a detailed scale in the village unit [1].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shifting paradigm of DRR that start from a detailed scale drives many researchers to develop an analysis method in a detailed scale. Most boarders methods used for developing vulnerability assessment are AHP (analytic hierarchy process) and SMCE (spatial multi-criteria evaluation), although they are not a new method [2]- [4]. Other development in vulnerability assessment also performed using Bayesian Network resulting in four criteria such as building damage, evacuation, resistant capacity, and loss of life [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, objective information is still shortage during the assessment process in previous methods. (2) How to manage the condition that experts provide multisource heterogeneous assessment information? experts are willing to give numeric values for objective attributes, while they would rather provide qualitative assessment for subjective attributes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%