2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0075-9511(04)80010-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing streams in Germany with benthic invertebrates: Development of a multimetric invertebrate based assessment system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, for the polyhaline muddy stretch the same situation occurred at station 6, where the percentage abundance of carnivore/omnivore specimens decrease (that promoted the worsening status of the two adjacent stations-5 and 7) was masked by the diversity and total abundance increase. Similar observations were also stated for freshwater systems, where Blocksom (2003) found that a scoring method using continuous scaling worked better than such a point scaling, being included in posterior IBI like indices development for streams (Bö hmer et al, 2004). The carnivore/omnivore species abundance percentage was one of the main index components that promoted the final stations classifications differences between sieves, especially on the meso-and oligohaline estuarine stretches.…”
Section: Benthic Index Of Biotic Integritysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Moreover, for the polyhaline muddy stretch the same situation occurred at station 6, where the percentage abundance of carnivore/omnivore specimens decrease (that promoted the worsening status of the two adjacent stations-5 and 7) was masked by the diversity and total abundance increase. Similar observations were also stated for freshwater systems, where Blocksom (2003) found that a scoring method using continuous scaling worked better than such a point scaling, being included in posterior IBI like indices development for streams (Bö hmer et al, 2004). The carnivore/omnivore species abundance percentage was one of the main index components that promoted the final stations classifications differences between sieves, especially on the meso-and oligohaline estuarine stretches.…”
Section: Benthic Index Of Biotic Integritysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Based on the literature (Barbour et al, 1999;Blocksom et al, 2002;Klemm et al, 2002;Klemm et al, 2003;Bo¨hmer et al, 2004;Ode et al, 2005;Hargett and Zumberge, 2006;Purcell et al, 2009), 37 metrics were initially chosen from community data of benthic macroinvertebrates (Table 1). Kerans and Karr (1994) and Klemm et al (2003) proposed five categories of metrics including richness, tolerance, composition, functional feeding group, and habitat type, while Stoddard et al (2009) classified candidate metrics in six categories with the addition of diversity.…”
Section: Initial Candidate Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high diversity and abundance of benthic macroinvertebrates, numerous metrics have been proposed to estimate ecological integrity (Lenat, 1993;Barbour et al, 1995Barbour et al, , 1996Reynoldson et al, 1997;Blocksom et al, 2002;Klemm et al, 2002). Up to 237 metrics (Whittier et al, 2007) have been reported and accordingly evaluated in streams (Kerans and Karr, 1994;Barbour et al, 1999;Klemm et al, 2002;Blocksom, 2003;Bo¨hmer et al, 2004;Ode et al, 2005;Whittier et al, 2007;Stoddard et al, 2009) and in lakes Solimini et al, 2008;Taowu et al, 2008;Trigal et al, 2009). The criteria used for selection were the degree of gradient (i.e., presenting the overall impact of an environment), discriminatory power Klemm et al, 2003), and the decrease in redundancy among similar metrics (Klemm et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stream health evaluation has been one of the hottest research areas over the recent decades in developed countries such as U.S.A. [1], Canada [2], France [3], Germany [4], and England [5]. Human interaction with the environment was inevitable and resulted in processes leading to several ecological perturbations in lotic ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%