2013
DOI: 10.1111/jon.12008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Accuracy and Reproducibility of Computer‐Assisted Analysis of 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT Using BasGan (V2)

Abstract: BasGan-assisted evaluations of (123) I-FP-CIT-SPECT were very useful, particularly in "doubtful" cases. Multicenter studies are mandatory before routine use of BasGan.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While in a single‐center setting, the use of BasGan allowed operators to achieve good reproducibility and accuracy, this study shows that in a multicenter setting, the level of accuracy is high, once the procedure has been appropriately standardized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While in a single‐center setting, the use of BasGan allowed operators to achieve good reproducibility and accuracy, this study shows that in a multicenter setting, the level of accuracy is high, once the procedure has been appropriately standardized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Another paper shows discrepancies in decisions taken by nuclear physicians on 123 I‐FP‐CIT reporting, albeit limited to few cases . Finally, a quantitative approach can also assist junior nuclear medicine physicians when interpreting scans, until more experience is acquired …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, visual reads had a very high negative predictive value but had more room for improvement in positive predictive value. To aid the clinician with assessing the quantitative loss of dopaminergic transporter sites in patients, several image processing software packages have been developed over the years (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Computer-aided analysis can provide critical adjunct information or a ''second read,'' which may be particularly useful for challenging cases (15)(16)(17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%