2008
DOI: 10.1201/9781420055139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
1,681
1
100

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,830 publications
(1,792 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
1,681
1
100
Order By: Relevance
“…The 165 statistical criteria were based on the confusion matrix created from the comparison 166 between the classification and the verification data. Generated from this confusion 167 matrix, the percentage of Pixels Correctly Classified (PCC) and the kappa coefficient of 168 agreement (κ) (Congalton, 1991) were analysed to assess the discrimination of classes. 169…”
Section: Classification Process 126mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 165 statistical criteria were based on the confusion matrix created from the comparison 166 between the classification and the verification data. Generated from this confusion 167 matrix, the percentage of Pixels Correctly Classified (PCC) and the kappa coefficient of 168 agreement (κ) (Congalton, 1991) were analysed to assess the discrimination of classes. 169…”
Section: Classification Process 126mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kappa coefficient is used to attest the quality of predictive mappings (Giasson et al, 2011). The error matrix for calculation of the Kappa coefficient was established according to Congalton (1991).…”
Section: Quality Of Models and Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model output of these algorithms can be seen as thematic maps with the two discrete classes PRA and NoPRA. Hence, for validation an error matrix (Figure 2) is calculated as it is known for the accuracy assessment of thematic mapping in remote sensing (Congalton and Green, 1999). To produce an error matrix, a reference dataset is needed.…”
Section: Validation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%