1994
DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(94)90103-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the classification accuracy of multisource remote sensing data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One potential problem associated with automatically classified maps is the production of omission and commission errors due to spectral similarity among targets or algorithm limitations (Shlien and Smith, 1975;Fitzgerald and Lees, 1994;Stehman, 1997;Salovaara et al, 2005). Thus, in order to generate more clearly differentiated results, we performed a manual edit of the maps to correct for class confusion and to adjust the limits of the land cover classes.…”
Section: Generating the Landscape Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One potential problem associated with automatically classified maps is the production of omission and commission errors due to spectral similarity among targets or algorithm limitations (Shlien and Smith, 1975;Fitzgerald and Lees, 1994;Stehman, 1997;Salovaara et al, 2005). Thus, in order to generate more clearly differentiated results, we performed a manual edit of the maps to correct for class confusion and to adjust the limits of the land cover classes.…”
Section: Generating the Landscape Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For different classification results three accuracy parameters -single class accuracy, total accuracy and total kappa coefficient [11] -were compared. All the classification accuracy parameters of fuzzy ARTMAP were better than those of the other two results.…”
Section: Results and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each photo interpreter's (observer's) classification accuracy was assessed at each scale (Story and Congalton 1986;Congalton 1991;Fitzgerald and Lees 1994). Data were assembled into classification error matrices by observer and scale comparing observer interpretations to field-sampled reference data at each site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%